Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26984614›Full record

ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2016

Prognostic implications of securin expression and sub-cellular localization in human breast cancer.

N Gurvits, H Repo, E Löyttyniemi, M Nykänen, J Anttinen, T Kuopio, K Talvinen, P Kronqvist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and CD8Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N GurvitsDepartment of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, 20500, Turku, Finland. natalia.gurvits@utu.fi.
H RepoDepartment of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, 20500, Turku, Finland.
E LöyttyniemiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
M NykänenDepartment of Pathology, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
J AnttinenDepartment of Pathology, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
T KuopioDepartment of Pathology, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
K TalvinenDepartment of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, 20500, Turku, Finland.
P KronqvistDepartment of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, 20500, Turku, Finland.
University of Turku · FICentral Finland Health Care District · FITurku University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSecurin belongs to a class of cell cycle regulators that prevent metaphase-to-anaphase transition until sister chromatid separation is complete. Evidence is accumulating that securin has a prognostic impact on a variety of malignancies but, thus far, the role and regulation of securin expression and its sub-cellular localization have not been systematically addressed in breast cancer.

methodsIn total 470 breast cancer specimens with follow-up data for up to 22 years were included. Immunohistochemical staining and immunofluorescence double-staining were performed for securin and its regulating proteins PTTG1IP, CDC20 and BUBR1. Prognostic associations were evaluated between the expression patterns of these proteins and established prognosticators of invasive breast cancer and patient survival.

resultsWe found that a high fraction of securin expressing cancer cells predicted an unfavorable clinical outcome of the breast cancer patients (p < 0.001). Also in multivariate analyses, the fraction of securin expressing cancer cells served as an independent prognosticator of a poor survival (p < 0.0001). We also found that the sub-cellular localization of securin exhibited prognostic power, since cytoplasmic securin expression in the cancer cells appeared to be associated with aggressive breast cancer subtypes and high breast cancer-associated mortality rates (p = 0.003). Through immunofluorescence double-staining, we found that PTTG1IP, CDC20 and BUBR1 exhibited distinct patterns of co-expression with securin, suggesting a regulatory role in the metaphase-to-anaphase transition in human breast cancer cells. We also noted that a subgroup of triple-negative breast carcinomas exhibited deviant expression patterns for the proteins studied.

conclusionsOur data indicate that securin expression may serve as a strong and independent prognosticator of breast cancer outcome and that a cytoplasmic localization of the protein may provide additional prognostic information, particularly in the biologically and clinically challenging subgroup of triple-negative breast carcinomas. The sub-cellular localization of securin appears to reflect the expression of PTTG1IP, CDC20 and BUBR1, which may participate in the regulation of securin activity and, ultimately, in the survival of breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsSecurinTissue Array AnalysisBiomarkers, Tumorpituitary tumor-transforming protein 1, humanSecurinBreast cancerBUBR1CDC20PrognosisPTTG1IPSecurin

Identifiers

PMID26984614
PMCPMC13001880
OpenAlexW2297085534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.