ReviewCritical care (London, England)2016
Mechanical circulatory support in the new era: an overview.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- A Proposed Algorithm for the Management of Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Based on Contemporary Knowledge and Gaps in Evidence.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Capillary refill time and tissue oxygen saturation as factors influencing lower limb ischemia in VA-ECMO: a case-control study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Case Report: A case of severe viral pneumonia complicated by pulmonary embolism treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with interventional thrombectomy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Heart Transplantation in High-Risk Recipients Employing Donor Marginal Grafts Preserved WithTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023Article
- Review
- ECMO in adults with congenital heart disease - Analysis of a national discharge database.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2022Article
- Excessive unbound cefazolin concentrations in critically ill patients receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO): an observational study.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Extracorporeal Gas Exchange for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Open Questions, Controversies and Future Directions.Membranes · 2021Review
- Point-of-care testing of plasma free hemoglobin and hematocrit for mechanical circulatory support.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Association of Oxygenation, Carbon Dioxide Removal, and Mechanical Ventilation Practices on Survival During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Volatile Sedation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Ultraprotective Ventilation.Critical care explorations · 2021Article
- Article
- Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Heart Failure Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.International journal of heart failure · 2020Review
- Hurdles to Cardioprotection in the Critically Ill.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Patient selection for VV ECMO: have we found the crystal ball?Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Predictors of intra-aortic balloon pump hemodynamic failure in non-acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.American heart journal · 2018Article
- Optimising drug dosing in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Review
- Development of a real-time and quantitative thrombus sensor for an extracorporeal centrifugal blood pump by near-infrared light.Biomedical optics express · 2018Article
- How New Support Devices Change Critical Care Delivery.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency medicine 2016. Other selected articles can be found online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2016. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.