Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26984449›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2016

FDA Approval Summary: Nivolumab for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Progression On or After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.

Dickran Kazandjian, Daniel L Suzman, Gideon Blumenthal, Sirisha Mushti, Kun He, Meredith Libeg, Patricia Keegan, Richard Pazdur

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05175235 (Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab Dose Optimisation in Solid Tumours With CURATE.AI Platform and Sequential ctDNA Measurements), which is not on this map. Cited by 231 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
231citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
26.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05175235 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab Dose Optimisation in Solid Tumours With CURATE.AI Platform and Sequential ctDNA Measurements

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Hospital, SingaporeRan2021 to 2023Enrolled10ConditionsSolid TumorArmsCURATE.AI, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

231 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 474 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients of different age groups: a meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Reversing T cell dysfunction in a novelFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article

171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dickran KazandjianOffice of Hematology and Oncology Products and Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA Dickran.kazandjian@fda.hhs.gov.
Daniel L SuzmanOffice of Hematology and Oncology Products and Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Gideon BlumenthalOffice of Hematology and Oncology Products and Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Sirisha MushtiOffice of Hematology and Oncology Products and Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Kun HeOffice of Hematology and Oncology Products and Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Meredith LibegOffice of Hematology and Oncology Products and Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Patricia KeeganOffice of Hematology and Oncology Products and Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Richard PazdurOffice of Hematology and Oncology Products and Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled: On October 9, 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration expanded the nivolumab metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) indication to include patients with nonsquamous NSCLC after a 3.25-month review timeline. Approval was based on demonstration of an improvement in overall survival (OS) in an international, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial comparing nivolumab to docetaxel in patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. The CheckMate 057 trial enrolled 582 patients who were randomized (1:1) to receive nivolumab or docetaxel. Nivolumab demonstrated improved OS compared with docetaxel at the prespecified interim analysis with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.73 (p = .0015), and a median OS of 12.2 months (95% CI: 9.7-15.0 months) in patients treated with nivolumab compared with 9.4 months (95% CI: 8.0-10.7 months) in patients treated with docetaxel. A statistically significant improvement in objective response rate (ORR) was also observed, with an ORR of 19% (95% CI: 15%-24%) in the nivolumab arm and 12% (95% CI: 9%-17%) in the docetaxel arm. The median duration of response was 17 months in the nivolumab arm and 6 months in the docetaxel arm. Progression-free survival was not statistically different between arms. A prespecified retrospective subgroup analysis suggested that patients with programmed cell death ligand 1-negative tumors treated with nivolumab had similar OS to those treated with docetaxel. The toxicity profile of nivolumab was consistent with the known immune-mediated adverse event profile except for 1 case of grade 5 limbic encephalitis, which led to a postmarketing requirement study to better characterize immune-mediated encephalitis. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Based on the results from the CheckMate 057 clinical trial, nivolumab represents a new treatment option for patients requiring second-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The role of nivolumab in patients with sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations is less clear. Until dedicated studies are performed to better characterize the role and sequence of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy, patients with EGFR or ALK alterations should have progressed on appropriate targeted therapy before initiating PD-1 inhibitor therapy. Some patients whose tumors lack programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression also appear to have durable responses. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval to Dako's PD-L1 test, PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx, which the applicant claimed as a nonessential complementary diagnostic for nivolumab use.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsB7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease ProgressionDocetaxelFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanDocetaxelNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTaxoidsImmunotherapyNivolumabNon-small cell lung carcinomaPD-1 inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID26984449
PMCPMC4861371
OpenAlexW2301488980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.