ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2016
Erratum: Histological criteria for atypical pituitary adenomas--data from the German pituitary adenoma registry suggests modifications.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic support in pediatric craniopharyngioma using deep learning.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- lncRNA-mRNA Expression Patterns in Invasive Pituitary Adenomas: A Microarray Analysis.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Identification of gene co-expression modules and hub genes associated with the invasiveness of pituitary adenoma.Endocrine · 2020Article
- Analyses and treatments of postoperative nasal complications after endonasal transsphenoidal resection of pituitary neoplasms.Medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in the author list. The name of one co-author is written wrong in the final version of the article; Dr Hans Ulrich Knappe should be Ulrich Johannes Knappe. The updated author list is provided below: Christian P. Miermeister, Stephan Petersenn, Michael Buchfelder, Rudolf Fahlbusch, Dieter K.Lüdecke, Annett Hölsken, Markus Bergmann, Ulrich Johannes Knappe, Volkmar H. Hans, Jörg Flitsch, Wolfgang Saeger and Rolf Buslei.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.