Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26984243›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Implementation of a mobile inpatient quality of life (QoL) assessment for oncology nursing.

Markus K Schuler, Freya Trautmann, Mirko Radloff, Roman Schmädig, Leopold Hentschel, Maria Eberlein-Gonska, Thomas Petzold, Heike Vetter, Sebastian Oberlack, Gerhard Ehninger and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Feasibility of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment for cancer patients using electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) in daily clinical practice.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Cancer patients' control preferences in decision making and associations with patient-reported outcomes: a prospective study in an outpatient cancer center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Markus K SchulerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Freya TrautmannCenter for Evidence Based Healthcare (ZEGV), Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Mirko RadloffDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Roman SchmädigDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Leopold HentschelDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. Leopold.Hentschel@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5792-2079
Maria Eberlein-GonskaDepartment of Quality and Medical Risk Management, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas PetzoldCenter for Evidence Based Healthcare (ZEGV), Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Heike VetterDepartment of Medical Information Technology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian OberlackDepartment of Medical Information Technology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Gerhard EhningerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Jochen SchmittCenter for Evidence Based Healthcare (ZEGV), Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer patients suffer from a variety of symptoms, but little is known about changes during hospitalization and symptom burden at discharge. We implemented an electronic quality of life (QoL) assessment used by the nursing team in routine inpatient care. Feasibility, acceptance, and the course of QoL were investigated.

methodsA self-administered electronic questionnaire based on the EQ-5D and the EORTC QLQ-C30 was applied in clinical routine. Cancer patients were approached by the nursing staff to complete the QoL assessment twice, at admission and at the day of discharge. Both the feedback of the nursing staff as well as characteristics of participants were used to evaluate the electronic assessment.

resultsOut of 210 patients from an oncologic ward, 85 patients (40 %) were invited to participate, 95 % of whom (n = 81) agreed to participate. Participation rate depended on the day of admission, the presence of the coordinating nurse, the overall morbidity assessed by patient clinical complexity level, and the patient age. Forty-six patients (56 %) asked for assistance in completing the questionnaire. Patients older than 53 years and male patients were more likely to need assistance. Twenty-two percent of the nursing staff (n = 5) use the information assessed for individual patient care. Fifty-two percent (n = 12) rated the additional workload as very little or little and 68 % (n = 15) agreed that handling for the patient was easy. Global QoL improved during the stay. Most severe symptoms at admission included fatigue, pain, appetite loss, and insomnia.

conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that it is feasible to implement and use an electronic QoL assessment by the nursing staff in routine inpatient cancer care. Obstacles and worries of staff members have to be considered when further developing this program.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansInpatientsInternetMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsOncology NursingPatient CarePilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesElectronic assessmentOncology nursingPatient careQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID26984243
OpenAlexW2297302874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.