ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2016
How Do We Manage Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia? A Survey of Clinical Practice Trends for Gastrointestinal Endoscopists in the United States.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AGA Clinical Practice Guidelines on Management of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia.Gastroenterology · 2020Guideline
- AGA Technical Review on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia-Epidemiology and Risk Factors.Gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- AGA Technical Review on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia-Natural History and Clinical Outcomes.Gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- Gastric Cancer Screening in the United States: A Review of Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia in the Los Angeles County System.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Improving the Endoscopic Detection and Management of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Through Training: A Practical Guide.Gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Index diagnoses of gastric intestinal metaplasia in the United States: patient characteristics, endoscopic findings, and clinical practice patterns at a large tertiary care center.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of gastric dysplasia and early cancer: Current evidence and what the future may hold.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Evaluation of a Phone Call Reminder Strategy in the Surveillance of Patients with Gastric Precancerous Lesions Lost to Follow-Up.Gastrointestinal tumors · 2020Article
- Histologic Subtyping of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia: Overview and Considerations for Clinical Practice.Gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Gastric intestinal metaplasia is associated with gastric dysplasia but is inversely correlated with esophageal dysplasia.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2017Article
- Improving Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Managing Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Among Gastroenterologists at a US Academic Institution.Journal of clinical gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is an accepted pathologic precursor to gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). While surveillance of GIM in Europe and Asia is common, only limited recommendations related to endoscopic surveillance of GIM exist in the United States.
aimTo understand the clinical practice patterns of US gastroenterologists in the management and endoscopic surveillance of GIM.
methodsA 23 item survey was developed to explore endoscopists' opinions regarding the surveillance of GIM and knowledge of current guidelines. Eight clinical vignettes were developed to address specific clinical scenarios where endoscopic surveillance of GIM might be considered.
resultsThere were 227 respondents, with 60 % working primarily in the private sector and 40 % in academic medicine. While 68 % of the respondents refer to major society guidelines for guidance in patient management, almost 78 % of endoscopist responders believe that there are no specific US guidelines pertaining to surveillance of GIM. Only two-thirds of respondents believe that based on current data, patients at increased risk of GAC should be a part of an endoscopic surveillance program, while 15 % believe all patients with GIM should receive endoscopic surveillance. Respondents use a wide range of biopsy techniques and surveillance intervals for patients with GIM, with no consistent pattern of practice identified.
conclusionsThere is variability in the knowledge and practice patterns of US endoscopists related to surveillance of gastric intestinal metaplasia. In the absence of detailed US GI society guidelines, many endoscopists perform surveillance endoscopy on patients with GIM using variable biopsy techniques and surveillance intervals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26984230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.