Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26983948›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Qualitative study to conceptualise a model of interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and general practitioners to support patients' adherence to medication.

Adam P Rathbone, Sarab M Mansoor, Ines Krass, Kim Hamrosi, Parisa Aslani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Moral dilemmas of community pharmacists: a narrative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam P RathboneFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, University of Durham, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Sarab M MansoorFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ines KrassFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kim HamrosiFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Parisa AslaniFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPharmacists and general practitioners (GPs) face an increasing expectation to collaborate interprofessionally on a number of healthcare issues, including medication non-adherence. This study aimed to propose a model of interprofessional collaboration within the context of identifying and improving medication non-adherence in primary care.

settingPrimary care; Sydney, Australia.

participants3 focus groups were conducted with pharmacists (n=23) and 3 with GPs (n=22) working in primary care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Qualitative investigation of GP and pharmacist interactions with each other, and specifically around supporting their patients' medication adherence. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and transcripts thematically analysed using a combination of manual and computer coding.

results3 themes pertaining to interprofessional collaboration were identified (1) frequency, (2) co-collaborators and (3) nature of communication which included 2 subthemes (method of communication and type of communication). While the frequency of interactions was low, the majority were conducted by telephone. Interactions, especially those conducted face-to-face, were positive. Only a few related to patient non-adherence. The findings are positioned within contemporary collaborative theory and provide an accessible introduction to models of interprofessional collaboration.

conclusionsThis work highlighted that successful collaboration to improve medication adherence was underpinned by shared paradigmatic perspectives and trust, constructed through regular, face-to-face interactions between pharmacists and GPs.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorGeneral PractitionersInterprofessional RelationsMedication AdherenceMedication Therapy ManagementPharmacistsAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaCommunicationCommunity Pharmacy ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleModels, Theoreticalcooperative behaviourinter-professional relationsmedication adherencepharmacistsphysicians

Identifiers

PMID26983948
PMCPMC4800113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.