Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26983636›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2016

Engineering anti-Lewis-Y hu3S193 antibodies with improved therapeutic ratio for radioimmunotherapy of epithelial cancers.

Ingrid J G Burvenich, Fook-Thean Lee, Graeme J O'Keefe, Dahna Makris, Diana Cao, Sylvia Gong, Angela Rigopoulos, Laura C Allan, Martin W Brechbiel, Zhanqi Liu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Preclinical Validation of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Engineered Antibodies as Cancer Radiotheranostics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Antibody Engineering for Nuclear Imaging and Radioimmunotherapy.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ingrid J G BurvenichTumour Targeting Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Fook-Thean LeeTumour Targeting Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Graeme J O'KeefeSchool of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Dahna MakrisTumour Targeting Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Diana CaoTumour Targeting Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sylvia GongDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Angela RigopoulosTumour Targeting Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Laura C AllanTumour Targeting Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Martin W BrechbielRadioimmune and Inorganic Chemistry Section, Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Zhanqi LiuTumour Targeting Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Paul A RamslandSchool of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Andrew M ScottTumour Targeting Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. andrew.scott@onjcri.org.au.

Funding

Metal Chelate Conjugated Monoclonal Antibodies for Tumor Diagnosis and TherapyZIASC006353 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI BRECHBIEL, MARTIN W · 2009 to 2017
$9.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study was to explore Fc mutations of a humanised anti-Lewis-Y antibody (IgG1) hu3S193 as a strategy to improve therapeutic ratios for therapeutic payload delivery.

methodsFour hu3S193 variants (I253A, H310A, H435A and I253A/H310A) were generated via site-directed mutagenesis and radiolabelled with diagnostic isotopes iodine-125 or indium-111. Biodistribution studies in Lewis-Y-positive tumour-bearing mice were used to calculate the dose in tumours and organs for therapeutic isotopes (iodine-131, yttrium-90 and lutetium-177).

results(111)In-labelled I253A and H435A showed similar slow kinetics (t 1/2β, 63.2 and 62.2 h, respectively) and a maximum tumour uptake of 33.11 ± 4.05 and 33.69 ± 3.77 percentage injected dose per gramme (%ID/g), respectively. (111)In-labelled I253A/H310A cleared fastest (t 1/2β, 9.1 h) with the lowest maximum tumour uptake (23.72 ± 0.85 %ID/g). The highest increase in tumour-to-blood area under the curve (AUC) ratio was observed with the metal-labelled mutants ((90)Y and (177)Lu). (177)Lu-CHX-A" DTPA-hu3S193 I253A/H310A (6:1) showed the highest tumour-to-blood AUC ratio compared to wild type (3:1) and other variants and doubling of calculated dose to tumour based on red marrow dose constraints.

conclusionsThese results suggest that hu3S193 Fc can be engineered with improved therapeutic ratios for (90)Y- and (177)Lu-based therapy, with the best candidate being hu3S193 I253A/H310A for (177)Lu-based therapy.

Indexed as

Antibody engineeringLewis-YPayload deliverySmall animal imagingTherapeutic ratio

Identifiers

PMID26983636
PMCPMC4796444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.