Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26983624›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2016

Management of Pregnant Women with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Consequences of Fetal Programming in Their Offspring.

Diane C Berry, Kim Boggess, Quinetta B Johnson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fetal programming of obesity and type 2 diabetes.World journal of diabetes · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Maternal and neonatal demographics of macrosomic infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diane C BerrySchool of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7460, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7460, USA. dberry@email.unc.edu.
Kim BoggessDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3010 Old Clinic Building, CB#7516, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7516, USA.
Quinetta B JohnsonDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3010 Old Clinic Building, CB#7516, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7516, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The obesity epidemic has fueled an epidemic of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women of childbearing age. This paper examines the state of the science on preconception and pregnancy management of women with type 2 diabetes to optimize outcomes for the women and their infants. In addition, the consequence of fetal programming as a result of suboptimal maternal glycemic control is discussed. The paper focuses on type 2 diabetes, not type 1 diabetes or gestational diabetes. Management of women with type 2 diabetes includes preconception counseling, preconception weight management and weight loss, proper weight gain during pregnancy, self-monitoring of blood glucose levels, medication, medical nutrition therapy, and exercise.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBody WeightDiabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycemic IndexHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeBlood GlucoseFetal programmingPoor glycemic controlPregnancyType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID26983624
OpenAlexW2300559835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.