Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26983623›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2017

Racial Disparities in Fertility Care: an Analysis of 4537 Intrauterine Insemination Cycles.

Irene Dimitriadis, Maria Batsis, John C Petrozza, Irene Souter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pharmacists' roles in assisted reproductive technology.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Discussions of miscarriage and preterm births on Twitter.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irene DimitriadisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center, Yawkey 10-A, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. idimitriadis@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.
Maria BatsisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center, Yawkey 10-A, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
John C PetrozzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center, Yawkey 10-A, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Irene SouterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center, Yawkey 10-A, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies suggest that race may affect access to fertility treatments and their outcomes. We examined whether race affects the following: duration of infertility prior to seeking evaluation, diagnosis, treatment cycle characteristics, and outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsDesign: Retrospective cohort. SETTINGS: Academic fertility center. PATIENTS: 4537 intrauterine insemination ± ovulation induction (IUI ± OI) cycles/1495 patients.

interventionsIUI following: (i) OI with either clomiphene citrate or gonadotropins and (ii) ultrasound-monitored natural cycles. OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration of infertility prior to seeking treatment, SART diagnosis, treatment cycle characteristics and outcomes (spontaneous abortion (SABR), clinical (CPR) and multiple pregnancy rates (MPR)).

resultsAsians and Hispanics compared to Caucasians waited significantly longer prior to seeking fertility evaluation (p < 0.01). The mean age of patients seeking infertility evaluation did not differ between groups nor did the type of treatment initially chosen by the patients. Idiopathic infertility was more common among Caucasians (p < 0.05, compared to all others) while PCOS and tubal factor infertility were more frequent among Hispanics (p < 0.05, compared to Caucasian, Asian, and mixed ancestry women) and decreased ovarian reserve was more common among African-Americans (p < 0.01, compared to Caucasians, Asians, and Hispanics). Gonadotropin cycle characteristics including dosing and duration of treatment, follicular recruitment, peak estradiol levels, and endometrial lining thickness differed between certain groups. However, no difference was found in CPR, MPR, and SABR between groups.

conclusionRace affects timely access to infertility care, diagnosis, and treatment cycle characteristics but not outcomes. Considering the nation's growing multiracial population, understanding the effect of race on fertility care becomes increasingly important.

Indexed as

EthnicityAbortion, SpontaneousAcademic Medical CentersAdultAsianBlack or African AmericanClomipheneFallopian Tube DiseasesFemaleFertility Agents, FemaleGonadotropinsHealthcare DisparitiesHelp-Seeking BehaviorHispanic or LatinoHumansInfertilityClomipheneFertility Agents, FemaleGonadotropinsinfertilityintrauterine inseminationovulation inductionRace

Identifiers

PMID26983623
OpenAlexW2310948701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.