Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26983403›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2016

Shifts in taxonomic and functional microbial diversity with agriculture: How fragile is the Brazilian Cerrado?

Renata Carolini Souza, Iêda Carvalho Mendes, Fábio Bueno Reis-Junior, Fabíola Marques Carvalho, Marco Antonio Nogueira, Ana Tereza Ribeiro Vasconcelos, Vânia Aparecida Vicente, Mariangela Hungria

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Crop rotation reduces the frequency of anaerobic soil bacteria in Red Latosol of Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Renata Carolini SouzaEmbrapa Soja, Soil Biotechnology, C.P. 231, 86001-970, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Iêda Carvalho MendesEmbrapa Cerrado, Soil Microbiology, C.P. 08223, 73301-970, Planaltina, DF, Brazil.
Fábio Bueno Reis-JuniorEmbrapa Cerrado, Soil Microbiology, C.P. 08223, 73301-970, Planaltina, DF, Brazil.
Fabíola Marques CarvalhoLNCC, Labinfo, Av. Getúlio Vargas 333, 25651-071, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil.
Marco Antonio NogueiraEmbrapa Soja, Soil Biotechnology, C.P. 231, 86001-970, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Ana Tereza Ribeiro VasconcelosLNCC, Labinfo, Av. Getúlio Vargas 333, 25651-071, Petrópolis, RJ, Brazil.
Vânia Aparecida VicenteDepartment Microbiology, Universidade Federal do Paraná, C.P. 19031, 81531-990, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Mariangela HungriaEmbrapa Soja, Soil Biotechnology, C.P. 231, 86001-970, Londrina, PR, Brazil. mariangela.hungria@embrapa.br.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRLaboratório Nacional de Computação Científica · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cerrado--an edaphic type of savannah--comprises the second largest biome of the Brazilian territory and is the main area for grain production in the country, but information about the impact of land conversion to agriculture on microbial diversity is still scarce. We used a shotgun metagenomic approach to compare undisturbed (native) soil and soils cropped for 23 years with soybean/maize under conservation tillage--"no-till" (NT)--and conventional tillage (CT) systems in the Cerrado biome.

resultsSoil management and fertilizer inputs with the introduction of agriculture improved chemical properties, but decreased soil macroporosity and microbial biomass of carbon and nitrogen. Principal coordinates analyses confirmed different taxonomic and functional profiles for each treatment. There was predominance of the Bacteria domain, especially the phylum Proteobacteria, with higher numbers of sequences in the NT and CT treatments; Archaea and Viruses also had lower numbers of sequences in the undisturbed soil. Within the Alphaproteobacteria, there was dominance of Rhizobiales and of the genus Bradyrhizobium in the NT and CT systems, attributed to massive inoculation of soybean, and also of Burkholderiales. In contrast, Rhizobium, Azospirillum, Xanthomonas, Pseudomonas and Acidobacterium predominated in the native Cerrado. More Eukaryota, especially of the phylum Ascomycota were detected in the NT. The functional analysis revealed lower numbers of sequences in the five dominant categories for the CT system, whereas the undisturbed Cerrado presented higher abundance.

conclusionHigh impact of agriculture in taxonomic and functional microbial diversity in the biome Cerrado was confirmed. Functional diversity was not necessarily associated with taxonomic diversity, as the less conservationist treatment (CT) presented increased taxonomic sequences and reduced functional profiles, indicating a strategy to try to maintain soil functioning by favoring taxa that are probably not the most efficient for some functions. Our results highlight that underneath the rustic appearance of the Cerrado vegetation there is a fragile soil microbial community.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySoil MicrobiologyAgricultureBacteriaBrazilCarbonMetagenomicsNitrogenPhylogenySoilCarbonNitrogenSoilCerradoFunctional biodiversityNo-tillageShotgun metagenomeSoil managementSoil microbiome

Identifiers

PMID26983403
PMCPMC4794851
OpenAlexW2298444693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.