Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26983014›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Is MTHFR 677 C>T Polymorphism Clinically Important in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS)? A Case-Control Study, Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

S Justin Carlus, Saumya Sarkar, Sandeep Kumar Bansal, Vertika Singh, Kiran Singh, Rajesh Kumar Jha, Nirmala Sadasivam, Sri Revathy Sadasivam, P S Gireesha, Kumarasamy Thangaraj and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. The Relationship between Homocysteine Levels,International journal of fertility & sterility · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

S Justin CarlusCSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India.
Saumya SarkarDivision of Endocrinology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Sandeep Kumar BansalDivision of Endocrinology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Vertika SinghBanaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Kiran SinghBanaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Rajesh Kumar JhaDivision of Endocrinology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Nirmala SadasivamMaaruthi Medical Centre and Hospitals, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sri Revathy SadasivamMaaruthi Medical Centre and Hospitals, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.
P S GireeshaYogi Vemana University, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Kumarasamy ThangarajCSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India.
Singh RajenderDivision of Endocrinology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India.
Central Drug Research Institute · INBanaras Hindu University · INCentre for Cellular and Molecular Biology · INTaibah University · SAYogi Vemana University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimum efficiency of the folate pathway is considered essential for adequate ovarian function. 677 C>T substitution in the 5, 10-methylene tertrahydrofolatereductase (MTHFR) gene compromises activity of the MTHFR enzyme by about 50%. The significance of correlation between 677C>T substitution and PCOS remains dubious due to the low power of published studies. METHODS AND

resultsWe analyzed MTHFR 677 C>T site in ethnically two different PCOS case-control groups (total 261 cases and 256 controls) from India. The data analysis revealed a lack of association between this polymorphism and PCOS [OR = 1.11 (95%CI = 0.71-1.72), P = 0.66]. Group-wise analysis on the basis of ethnicity also revealed no association in any of the ethnic groups [Indo-Europeans, P = 1; Dravidians, P = 0.70]. Homocysteine levels did not differ significantly between cases (15.51 μmol/L, SD = 2.89) and controls (15.89 μmol/L, SD = 2.23). We also undertook a meta-analysis on 960 cases and 1028 controls, which suggested a significant association of the substitution with PCOS in the dominant model of analysis (OR = 1.47 (95%CI = 1.04-2.09), P = 0.032]. Trial sequential analysis corroborated findings of the traditional meta-analysis. However, we found that the conclusions of meta-analysis were strongly influenced by studies that deviated from the Hardy Weinberg equilibrium. A careful investigation of each study and a trial sequential analysis suggested that 677 C>T substitution holds no clinical significance in PCOS in most of the populations.

conclusionIn conclusion, MTHFR 677 C>T polymorphism does not affect PCOS risk in India. The association seen in the meta-analysis is due to an outlier study and studies showing deviation from the Hardy Weinberg equilibrium.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)Polycystic Ovary SyndromeMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)

Identifiers

PMID26983014
PMCPMC4794143
OpenAlexW2299181839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.