Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26982879›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Complete Reversible Refolding of a G-Protein Coupled Receptor on a Solid Support.

Natalie Di Bartolo, Emma L R Compton, Tony Warne, Patricia C Edwards, Christopher G Tate, Gebhard F X Schertler, Paula J Booth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lipid bilayer composition modulates the unfolding free energy of a knotted α-helical membrane protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  4. Kinetic stability of membrane proteins.Biophysical reviews · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalie Di BartoloSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Emma L R ComptonOrganisational and Staff Development Unit, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Tony WarneMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Patricia C EdwardsMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Christopher G TateMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Gebhard F X SchertlerLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Paula J BoothSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBPaul Scherrer Institute · CHUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G002037/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G003653/1Medical Research Council MC_U105197215Medical Research Council U10519215Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 72075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The factors defining the correct folding and stability of integral membrane proteins are poorly understood. Folding of only a few select membrane proteins has been scrutinised, leaving considerable deficiencies in knowledge for large protein families, such as G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Complete reversible folding, which is problematic for any membrane protein, has eluded this dominant receptor family. Moreover, attempts to recover receptors from denatured states are inefficient, yielding at best 40-70% functional protein. We present a method for the reversible unfolding of an archetypal family member, the β1-adrenergic receptor, and attain 100% recovery of the folded, functional state, in terms of ligand binding, compared to receptor which has not been subject to any unfolding and retains its original, folded structure. We exploit refolding on a solid support, which could avoid unwanted interactions and aggregation that occur in bulk solution. We determine the changes in structure and function upon unfolding and refolding. Additionally, we employ a method that is relatively new to membrane protein folding; pulse proteolysis. Complete refolding of β1-adrenergic receptor occurs in n-decyl-β-D-maltoside (DM) micelles from a urea-denatured state, as shown by regain of its original helical structure, ligand binding and protein fluorescence. The successful refolding strategy on a solid support offers a defined method for the controlled refolding and recovery of functional GPCRs and other membrane proteins that suffer from instability and irreversible denaturation once isolated from their native membranes.

Indexed as

Circular DichroismElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelLigandsProtein FoldingProtein UnfoldingProteolysisReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSpectrometry, FluorescenceSpectrophotometry, UltravioletUreaLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledUrea

Identifiers

PMID26982879
PMCPMC4794186
OpenAlexW2300875869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.