Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26981574›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2016

Bacterial Cytological Profiling (BCP) as a Rapid and Accurate Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Method for Staphylococcus aureus.

D T Quach, G Sakoulas, V Nizet, J Pogliano, K Pogliano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Achilles' heel for methicillin-resistantAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Synthesis of Ag/TiOScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning-driven bacterial cytological profiling to determine antimicrobial mechanisms inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Measuring beta-lactam minimum inhibitory concentrations inJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Sensing of Antibiotic-Bacteria Interactions.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D T QuachDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA, USA; Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA, USA.
G SakoulasDivision of Pediatric Pharmacology & Drug Discovery, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA, USA.
V NizetDivision of Pediatric Pharmacology & Drug Discovery, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA, USA; Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA, USA.
J PoglianoDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA, USA.
K PoglianoDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

Identification of natural products targeting new pathways in bacteriaR01AI113295 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI POGLIANO, JOSEPH A, POGLIANO, KIT J · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS AI113295NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI113295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful treatment of bacterial infections requires the timely administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The failure to initiate the correct therapy in a timely fashion results in poor clinical outcomes, longer hospital stays, and higher medical costs. Current approaches to antibiotic susceptibility testing of cultured pathogens have key limitations ranging from long run times to dependence on prior knowledge of genetic mechanisms of resistance. We have developed a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility assay for Staphylococcus aureus based on bacterial cytological profiling (BCP), which uses quantitative fluorescence microscopy to measure antibiotic induced changes in cellular architecture. BCP discriminated between methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and -resistant (MRSA) clinical isolates of S. aureus (n = 71) within 1-2 h with 100% accuracy. Similarly, BCP correctly distinguished daptomycin susceptible (DS) from daptomycin non-susceptible (DNS) S. aureus strains (n = 20) within 30 min. Among MRSA isolates, BCP further identified two classes of strains that differ in their susceptibility to specific combinations of beta-lactam antibiotics. BCP provides a rapid and flexible alternative to gene-based susceptibility testing methods for S. aureus, and should be readily adaptable to different antibiotics and bacterial species as new mechanisms of resistance or multidrug-resistant pathogens evolve and appear in mainstream clinical practice.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Typing TechniquesDaptomycinMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsDaptomycinAntibiotic resistanceMultidrug resistant bacteriaStaphylococcus aureusSusceptibility tests

Identifiers

PMID26981574
PMCPMC4776060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.