Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26981374›Full record

ArticleGenomics data2016

Metagenomic exploration of the bacterial community structure at Paradip Port, Odisha, India.

Arnab Pramanik, Pijush Basak, Satabdi Banerjee, Sanghamitra Sengupta, Dhrubajyoti Chattopadhyay, Maitree Bhattacharyya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics data, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bacterial diversity in the aquatic system in India based on metagenome analysis-a critical review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arnab PramanikDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata 700 019, West Bengal, India.
Pijush BasakDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata 700 019, West Bengal, India.
Satabdi BanerjeeDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata 700 019, West Bengal, India.
Sanghamitra SenguptaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata 700 019, West Bengal, India.
Dhrubajyoti ChattopadhyayAmity University, Major Arterial Road, Action Area II, Kadampukur Village, Rajarhat, Newtown, Kolkata, West Bengal 700156, India.
Maitree BhattacharyyaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata 700 019, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a pioneering report on the metagenomic exploration of the bacterial diversity from a busy sea port in Paradip, Odisha, India. In our study, high-throughput sequencing of community 16S rRNA gene amplicon was performed using 454 GS Junior platform. Metagenome contain 34,121 sequences with 16,677,333 bp and 56.3% G + C content. Metagenome sequences data are now available at NCBI under the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database with accession no. SRX897055. Community metagenome sequence revealed the presence of 11,705 species belonging to 40 different phyla. Bacteroidetes (23%), Firmicutes (19%), Proteobacteria (17%), Spirochaetes (10%), Nitrospirae (8%), Actinobacteria (7%) and Acidobacteria (3%) are the predominant bacterial phyla in this port soil. Analysis of metagenomic sequences unfolded the interesting distribution of several phyla which pointed to the significant anthropogenic intervention influencing the bacterial community character of this port.

Indexed as

BacteriaDiversityMetagenomicsParadip PortPyrosequencing

Identifiers

PMID26981374
PMCPMC4778619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.