Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26981234›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational allergy2016

Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?

Alexandra F Santos, Gideon Lack

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational allergy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Progenitor cell-derived basophils: A novel barcoded passive degranulation assay in allergic diseases.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Development of a tool predicting severity of allergic reaction during peanut challenge.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2018
    Trial
  5. Irradiation does not impact the immunogenicity of food flours used for oral immunotherapy.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Basophil Activation Test Utility as a Diagnostic Tool in LTP Allergy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandra F SantosDepartment of Paediatric Allergy, Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London, London, UK ; MRC and Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK.
Gideon LackDepartment of Paediatric Allergy, Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London, London, UK ; MRC and Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0902018Medical Research Council G1000758Medical Research Council MR/M008517/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold-standard to diagnose food allergy; however, it is a labour and resource-intensive procedure with the risk of causing an acute allergic reaction, which is potentially severe. Therefore, OFC are reserved for cases where the clinical history and the results of skin prick test and/or specific IgE do not confirm or exclude the diagnosis of food allergy. This is a significant proportion of patients seen in Allergy clinics and results in a high demand for OFC. The basophil activation test (BAT) has emerged as a new diagnostic test for food allergy. With high diagnostic accuracy, it can be particularly helpful in the cases where skin prick test and specific IgE are equivocal and may allow reducing the need for OFC. BAT has high specificity, which confers a high degree of certainty in confirming the diagnosis of food allergy and allows deferring the performance of OFC in patients with a positive BAT. The diagnostic utility of BAT is allergen-specific and needs to be validated for different allergens and in specific patient populations. Standardisation of the laboratory methodology and of the data analyses would help to enable a wider clinical application of BAT.

Indexed as

Basophil activation testCD203cCD63DiagnosisFood allergyImmunotherapyPeanut allergy

Identifiers

PMID26981234
PMCPMC4791855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.