Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26981190›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2016

Does autologous blood transfusion during liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma increase risk of recurrence?

Raphael Lc Araujo, Carlos Andrés Pantanali, Luciana Haddad, Joel Avancini Rocha Filho, Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'Albuquerque, Wellington Andraus

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05452538 (Autotransfusion Versus Transfusion in Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05452538 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Autotransfusion Versus Transfusion in Cancer Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Leon BerardRan2021 to 2022Enrolled5,808ConditionsHemorrhage, Cancer Surgery, TransfusionArmsTransfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Safety of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Cancer Surgery: An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raphael Lc AraujoRaphael LC Araujo, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Carlos Andrés PantanaliRaphael LC Araujo, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Luciana HaddadRaphael LC Araujo, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Joel Avancini Rocha FilhoRaphael LC Araujo, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'AlbuquerqueRaphael LC Araujo, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Wellington AndrausRaphael LC Araujo, Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRCreative Research Enterprises (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo analyze outcomes in patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and received autologous intraoperative blood salvage (IBS).

methodsConsecutive HCC patients who underwent LT were studied retrospectively and analyzed according to the use of IBS or not. Demographic and surgical data were collected from a departmental prospective maintained database. Statistical analyses were performed using the Fisher's exact test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test to examine covariate differences between patients who underwent IBS and those who did not. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were developed to evaluate recurrence and death, and survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.

resultsBetween 2002 and 2012, 158 consecutive patients who underwent LT in the same medical center and by the same surgical team were identified. Among these patients, 122 (77.2%) were in the IBS group and 36 (22.8%) in the non-IBS group. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) at 5 years were 59.7% and 83.3%, respectively. No differences in OS (P = 0.51) or RFS (P = 0.953) were detected between the IBS and non-IBS groups. On multivariate analysis for OS, degree of tumor differentiation remained as the only independent predictor. Regarding patients who received IBS, no differences were detected in OS or RFS (P = 0.055 and P = 0.512, respectively) according to the volume infused, even when outcomes at 90 d or longer were analyzed separately (P = 0.518 for both outcomes).

conclusionNo differences in RFS or OS were detected according to IBS use. Trials addressing this question are justified and should be designed to detect small differences in long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

CancerCell saverHepatocellular carcinomaLiver transplantationRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID26981190
PMCPMC4770170
OpenAlexW2334764032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.