Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26981108›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2016

Angiogenesis in tissue-engineered nerves evaluated objectively using MICROFIL perfusion and micro-CT scanning.

Hong-Kui Wang, Ya-Xian Wang, Cheng-Bin Xue, Zhen-Mei-Yu Li, Jing Huang, Ya-Hong Zhao, Yu-Min Yang, Xiao-Song Gu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Imaging in the repair of peripheral nerve injury.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hong-Kui WangSchool of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Ya-Xian WangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Cheng-Bin XueJiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zhen-Mei-Yu LiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jing HuangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Ya-Hong ZhaoJiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yu-Min YangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Xiao-Song GuSchool of Biology and Basic Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2562-6275
Nantong University · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis is a key process in regenerative medicine generally, as well as in the specific field of nerve regeneration. However, no convenient and objective method for evaluating the angiogenesis of tissue-engineered nerves has been reported. In this study, tissue-engineered nerves were constructed in vitro using Schwann cells differentiated from rat skin-derived precursors as supporting cells and chitosan nerve conduits combined with silk fibroin fibers as scaffolds to bridge 10-mm sciatic nerve defects in rats. Four weeks after surgery, three-dimensional blood vessel reconstructions were made through MICROFIL perfusion and micro-CT scanning, and parameter analysis of the tissue-engineered nerves was performed. New blood vessels grew into the tissue-engineered nerves from three main directions: the proximal end, the distal end, and the middle. The parameter analysis of the three-dimensional blood vessel images yielded several parameters, including the number, diameter, connection, and spatial distribution of blood vessels. The new blood vessels were mainly capillaries and microvessels, with diameters ranging from 9 to 301 μm. The blood vessels with diameters from 27 to 155 μm accounted for 82.84% of the new vessels. The microvessels in the tissue-engineered nerves implanted in vivo were relatively well-identified using the MICROFIL perfusion and micro-CT scanning method, which allows the evaluation and comparison of differences and changes of angiogenesis in tissue-engineered nerves implanted in vivo.

Indexed as

angiogenesischitosan nerve conduitmicro-CTMICROFIL perfusionnerve regenerationneural regenerationSchwann cellskin-derived precursorthree-dimensional reconstructiontissue-engineered nerve

Identifiers

PMID26981108
PMCPMC4774213
OpenAlexW2297534547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.