Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26980518›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2016

Fish Karyome version 2.1: a chromosome database of fishes and other aquatic organisms.

Naresh Sahebrao Nagpure, Ajey Kumar Pathak, Rameshwar Pati, Iliyas Rashid, Jyoti Sharma, Shri Prakash Singh, Mahender Singh, Uttam Kumar Sarkar, Basdeo Kushwaha, Ravindra Kumar and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unravelling the genomic features, phylogeny and genetic basis of tooth ontogenesis in Characiformes through analysis of four genomes.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Naresh Sahebrao NagpureDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology.
Ajey Kumar PathakDivision of Fish Taxonomy and Resources, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Canal Ring Road, PO-Dilkusha, Lucknow 226002, UP, India pathakajey@rediffmail.com.
Rameshwar PatiDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology.
Iliyas RashidDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology.
Jyoti SharmaDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology.
Shri Prakash SinghDivision of Fish Taxonomy and Resources, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Canal Ring Road, PO-Dilkusha, Lucknow 226002, UP, India.
Mahender SinghDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology.
Uttam Kumar SarkarDivision of Fish Taxonomy and Resources, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Canal Ring Road, PO-Dilkusha, Lucknow 226002, UP, India.
Basdeo KushwahaDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology.
Ravindra KumarDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology.
S MuraliDivision of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology.
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology · BGNational Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A voluminous information is available on karyological studies of fishes; however, limited efforts were made for compilation and curation of the available karyological data in a digital form. 'Fish Karyome' database was the preliminary attempt to compile and digitize the available karyological information on finfishes belonging to the Indian subcontinent. But the database had limitations since it covered data only on Indian finfishes with limited search options. Perceiving the feedbacks from the users and its utility in fish cytogenetic studies, the Fish Karyome database was upgraded by applying Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP (pre hypertext processor) (LAMP) technologies. In the present version, the scope of the system was increased by compiling and curating the available chromosomal information over the globe on fishes and other aquatic organisms, such as echinoderms, molluscs and arthropods, especially of aquaculture importance. Thus, Fish Karyome version 2.1 presently covers 866 chromosomal records for 726 species supported with 253 published articles and the information is being updated regularly. The database provides information on chromosome number and morphology, sex chromosomes, chromosome banding, molecular cytogenetic markers, etc. supported by fish and karyotype images through interactive tools. It also enables the users to browse and view chromosomal information based on habitat, family, conservation status and chromosome number. The system also displays chromosome number in model organisms, protocol for chromosome preparation and allied techniques and glossary of cytogenetic terms. A data submission facility has also been provided through data submission panel. The database can serve as a unique and useful resource for cytogenetic characterization, sex determination, chromosomal mapping, cytotaxonomy, karyo-evolution and systematics of fishes. Database URL: http://mail.nbfgr.res.in/Fish_Karyome.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticKaryotypingAnimalsAquatic OrganismsChromosomesFeedbackFishesInternetModels, AnimalUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID26980518
PMCPMC4792524
OpenAlexW2337163006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.