Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26980480›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2016

Human papillomavirus type 16 viral load is decreased following a therapeutic vaccination.

Hannah N Coleman, William W Greenfield, Shawna L Stratton, Rita Vaughn, Alexander Kieber, Andrea M Moerman-Herzog, Horace J Spencer, Wilbur C Hitt, Charles Matthew Quick, Laura F Hutchins and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Tumor Antigens beyond the Human Exome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hannah N ColemanDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Slot 502, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, USA.
William W GreenfieldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Shawna L StrattonTranslational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Rita VaughnTranslational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Alexander KieberDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Slot 502, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, USA.
Andrea M Moerman-HerzogDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Horace J SpencerDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Wilbur C HittDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Charles Matthew QuickDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Slot 502, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, USA.
Laura F HutchinsDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Samuel G MackintoshDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Ricky D EdmondsonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Stephen W EricksonDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Mayumi NakagawaDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Slot 502, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, USA. mnakagawa@uams.edu.

Funding

Understanding Hesitant AdoptersP20GM103429 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Lawrence E Cornett, JERRY WARE · 2012 to 2026
$60.9M
Study of the Cell-specific Inflammasome Responses During Defense Against Gram-negative BacteriaP20GM103625 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI SMELTZER, MARK S · 2012 to 2021
$21.5M
Understanding and Enhancing T-Cell Responses to High Risk Human Papillomaviruses-RenewalR01CA143130 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI NAKAGAWA, MAYUMI · 2010 to 2025
$10.0M
Arkansas Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000039 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BECK, CORNELIA MARIE, JAMES, LAURA P · 2012 to 2014
$10.0M
Center for Protein Structure and FunctionP30GM103450 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI MILLETT, FRANCIS S · 2012 to 2014
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000039NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000039NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143130NCI NIH HHS R01CA143130NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103429NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103429NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103625NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103625NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103450NIGMS NIH HHS P30GM103450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the dose-escalation phase of a Phase I clinical trial in which six subjects each were vaccinated with PepCan at the 50, 100, 250, and 500 μg per peptide dose, the 50 μg dose showed the best histological regression rate. Ten additional subjects were vaccinated at this dose in the final dose phase. As with the dose-escalation phase, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Overall, the histological regression rates were 50% at the 50 μg dose (7 of 14) and 100 μg dose (3 of 6), and 45 % overall (14 of 31). Of subjects in whom HPV type 16 (HPV 16) was detected at entry, it became undetectable in three subjects after vaccination, and the viral loads significantly decreased in nine subjects in whom HPV 16 infection was detected at entry and exit (p = 0.008). Immune profiling revealed increased T-helper type 1 cells after vaccinations (p = 0.02 and 0.0004 after 2 and 4 vaccinations, respectively). T-helper type 2 cells initially increased after two vaccinations (p = 0.01), but decreased below the baseline level after four vaccinations although not significantly. Pre-vaccination regulatory T cell levels were significantly lower in histological responders compared to non-responders (p = 0.03). Feasibility of testing plasma for multiplex cytokine/chemokine analysis and of performing proteomic analysis of PBMCs was examined for potentially identifying biomarkers in the future. While these analyses are feasible to perform, attention needs to be given to how soon the blood samples would be processed after phlebotomy. As sufficient safety of PepCan has been demonstrated, enrollment for the Phase II clinical trial has been opened.

Indexed as

AdultChromatography, LiquidCytokinesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsHuman papillomavirus 16HumansLeukocytes, MononuclearMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsProteomeProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCytokinesProteomeVaccines, SubunitCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaClinical trialHPVT cellsTherapeutic vaccineViral load

Identifiers

PMID26980480
PMCPMC4841729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.