Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26980400›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2016

Ecological Momentary Assessment of Illicit Drug Use Compared to Biological and Self-Reported Methods.

Beth S Linas, Andrew Genz, Ryan P Westergaard, Larry W Chang, Robert C Bollinger, Carl Latkin, Gregory D Kirk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Beth S LinasJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, MD, USA. Blinas@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-5147
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

The AIDS Linked to the Intravenous Experience (ALIVE) StudyU01DA036297 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Gregory D Kirk, Shruti H Mehta · 2014 to 2026
$28.9M
INCIDENCE OF HIV INFECTIONS IN A COHORT OF IV DRUG USERSR01DA012568 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MEHTA, SHRUTI H · 1999 to 2017
$15.5M
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF HIV INFECTION AMONG DRUG USERSR01DA004334 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIRK, GREGORY D · 1987 to 2011
$7.6M
Johns Hopkins HIV Epidemiology and Prevention Sciences Training ProgramT32AI102623 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Shruti H Mehta · 2013 to 2026
$5.3M
Barriers to Effective HIV Care for Injection Drug Users After Release from PrisonK23DA032306 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WESTERGAARD, RYAN PATRICK · 2012 to 2016
$975k
Peer health workers: Impact on retention, care and secondary prevention of PLHIVK23MH086338 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, LARRY WILLIAM · 2010 to 2014
$914k
Patient-Oriented Research and Mentorship in HIV and Non-Communicable DiseasesK24AI118591 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIRK, GREGORY D · 2015 to 2019
$766k
Technology-Enhanced Peer Navigation to Improve IDUs' Engagement in HIV CareR34DA033181 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIRK, GREGORY D, WESTERGAARD, RYAN PATRICK · 2012 to 2013
$728k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI118591NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI102623NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA032306NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA004334NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012568NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA033181NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036297NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH086338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of mHealth methods for capturing illicit drug use and associated behaviors have become more widely used in research settings, yet there is little research as to how valid these methods are compared to known measures of capturing and quantifying drug use.

objectiveWe examined the concordance of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of drug use to previously validated biological and audio-computer assisted self-interview (ACASI) methods.

methodsThe Exposure Assessment in Current Time (EXACT) study utilized EMA methods to assess drug use in real-time in participants' natural environments. Utilizing mobile devices, participants self-reported each time they used heroin or cocaine over a 4-week period. Each week, PharmChek sweat patch samples were collected for measurement of heroin and cocaine and participants answered an ACASI-based questionnaire to report behaviors and drug using events during the prior week. Reports of cocaine and heroin use captured through EMA were compared to weekly biological or self-report measures through percent agreement and concordance correlation coefficients to account for repeated measures. Correlates of discordance were obtained from logistic regression models.

resultsA total of 109 participants were a median of 48.5 years old, 90% African American, and 52% male. During 436 person-weeks of observation, we recorded 212 (49%) cocaine and 103 (24%) heroin sweat patches, 192 (44%) cocaine and 161 (37%) heroin ACASI surveys, and 163 (37%) cocaine and 145 (33%) heroin EMA reports. The percent agreement between EMA and sweat patch methods was 70% for cocaine use and 72% for heroin use, while the percent agreement between EMA and ACASI methods was 77% for cocaine use and 79% for heroin use. Misreporting of drug use by EMA compared to sweat patch and ACASI methods were different by illicit drug type.

conclusionsOur work demonstrates moderate to good agreement of EMA to biological and standard self-report methods in capturing illicit drug use. Limitations occur with each method and accuracy may differ by type of illicit drugs used.

Indexed as

ACASIecological momentary assessmentillicit drug usemHealthsweat patch

Identifiers

PMID26980400
PMCPMC4812047
OpenAlexW2301647761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.