Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26980326›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Larval habitats of the Anopheles farauti and Anopheles lungae complexes in the Solomon Islands.

Tanya L Russell, Thomas R Burkot, Hugo Bugoro, Allan Apairamo, Nigel W Beebe, Weng K Chow, Robert D Cooper, Frank H Collins, Neil F Lobo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tanya L RussellAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia. tanya.russell@jcu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-6844
Thomas R BurkotAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia.
Hugo BugoroNational Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Allan ApairamoNational Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Nigel W BeebeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4068, Australia.
Weng K ChowAustralian Army Malaria Institute, Gallipoli Barracks, Enoggera, 4052, Australia.
Robert D CooperAustralian Army Malaria Institute, Gallipoli Barracks, Enoggera, 4052, Australia.
Frank H CollinsEck Institute for Global Health, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Neil F LoboEck Institute for Global Health, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.

Funding

TransmissionU19AI089686 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KAZURA, JAMES WALTER · 2010 to 2016
$9.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089686NIAID NIH HHS U19AI08986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an urgent need for vector control tools to supplement long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying; particularly in the Solomon Islands where the primary vector, Anopheles farauti, is highly anthropophagic and feeds mainly outdoors and early in the evening. Currently, the only supplementary tool recommended by the World Health Organization is larval source management (LSM). The feasibility and potential effectiveness of LSM requires information on the distribution of anophelines, the productivity of larval habitats and the potential impacts of larval control on adult fitness.

methodsThe distribution of anophelines in Central and Western Provinces in the Solomon Islands was mapped from cross-sectional larval habitat surveys. The composition and micro-distribution of larval instars within a large permanent river-mouth lagoon was examined with a longitudinal survey. Density-dependent regulation of An. farauti larvae was investigated by longitudinally following the development and survival of different densities of first instars in floating cages in a river-mouth lagoon.

resultsFive anopheline species were molecularly identified from a range of fresh and brackish water habitats: An. farauti s.s., An. hinesorum, An. lungae, An. nataliae and An. solomonis. The most common habitats used by the primary malaria vector, An. farauti, were coastal lagoons and swamps. In the detailed study of lagoon micro-productivity, An. farauti was non-uniformly distributed with highest densities found at collections sites most proximal and distal to the mouth of the lagoon. The survival of An. farauti larvae was more than twofold lower when larvae were held at the highest experimental density (1 larva per 3.8 cm(2)) when compared with the lowest density (1 larva per 38 cm(2)).

conclusionsThe only documented major malaria vector collected in larval surveys in both Central and Western Provinces was An. farauti. Lagoons and swamps, the most common, largest and (potentially) most productive larval sites of this malaria vector, were "few, fixed and findable" and theoretically, therefore, amenable to successful LSM. However, the immense scale and complexity of these ecosystems in which An. farauti larvae are found raises questions regarding the ability to effectively control the larvae, as incomplete larviciding could trigger density dependent effects resulting in increased larval survivorship. While LSM has the potential to significantly contribute to malaria control of this early and outdoor biting vector, more information on the distribution of larvae within these extensive habitats is required to maximize the effectiveness of LSM.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsAnophelesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleLarvaLongitudinal StudiesMelanesiaPhylogeographyPopulation DensityAnopheles farautiDensity dependent developmentMalariaSolomon IslandsSpecies distribution

Identifiers

PMID26980326
PMCPMC4791962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.