Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26980319›Full record

ReviewEating and weight disorders : EWD2016

A comprehensive review of psychodynamic treatments for eating disorders.

Giovanni Abbate-Daga, Enrica Marzola, Federico Amianto, Secondo Fassino

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanni Abbate-DagaDepartment of Neuroscience, Eating Disorders Center for Treatment and Research, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy. giovanni.abbatedaga@unito.it.
Enrica MarzolaDepartment of Neuroscience, Eating Disorders Center for Treatment and Research, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Federico AmiantoDepartment of Neuroscience, Eating Disorders Center for Treatment and Research, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Secondo FassinoDepartment of Neuroscience, Eating Disorders Center for Treatment and Research, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo comprehensively review the existing literature on the effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapies in eating disorders (EDs) and to stimulate both debate and research on this topic.

methodsOnline and hand searches were conducted to identify papers published between 1980 and 2015 on psychodynamic treatments delivered to adults with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge eating disorder (BED).

resultsA total of 47 studies were finally included in this review. Fifteen studies were available for AN, 9 for BN, 12 for BED, and 11 for samples with mixed diagnoses. Several methodological flaws emerged, but overall psychodynamic interventions showed promising results at the end of treatment and follow-up, when available.

conclusionsThe body of literature on psychodynamic treatments is sparse and sometimes methodologically questionable; nevertheless, current data provide support to the effectiveness of these interventions, particularly for AN. However, both a defined approach (focus, themes, and techniques) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are warranted to clarify the effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapies.

Indexed as

AdultFeeding and Eating DisordersHumansPsychotherapy, PsychodynamicTreatment OutcomeAnorexia nervosaBinge eating disorderBulimia nervosaPsychodynamic psychotherapyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID26980319
OpenAlexW2302168258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.