Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26980187›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2016

A decade of the anaphase-promoting complex in the nervous system.

Ju Huang, Azad Bonni

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Examining the mechanistic relationship of APC/CProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. APC/CProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ju HuangDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Azad BonniDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

REGULATION OF NEURONAL DEVELOPMENT BY UBIQUITIN PATHWAYSR01NS051255 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, ALBERT HONG-JAE · 2005 to 2020
$5.6M
NINDS NIH HHS NS051255NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of protein abundance by the ubiquitin-proteasome system is essential for normal brain development and function. Just over a decade ago, the first post-mitotic function of the anaphase-promoting complex, a major cell cycle-regulated E3 ubiquitin ligase, was discovered in the control of axon growth and patterning in the mammalian brain. Since then, a large number of studies have identified additional novel roles for the anaphase-promoting complex in diverse aspects of neuronal connectivity and plasticity in the developing and mature nervous system. In this review, we discuss the functions and mechanisms of the anaphase-promoting complex in neurogenesis, glial differentiation and migration, neuronal survival and metabolism, neuronal morphogenesis, synapse formation and plasticity, and learning and memory. We also provide a perspective on future investigations of the anaphase-promoting complex in neurobiology.

Indexed as

Anaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeAnimalsBrainHumansMolecular StructureNervous SystemNeurogenesisSynapsesAnaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosomeanaphase-promoting complexE3 ubiquitin ligaseubiquitin–proteasome system

Identifiers

PMID26980187
PMCPMC4803049
OpenAlexW2302362255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.