Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26980141›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2016

A qualitative study of patients' perspectives on collaboration to support self-management in routine rheumatology consultations.

Emma Dures, Sarah Hewlett, Nicholas Ambler, Remona Jenkins, Joyce Clarke, Rachael Gooberman-Hill

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Participation in healthcare consultations: A qualitative study from the perspectives of persons diagnosed with hand osteoarthritis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Appropriating and asserting power on inflammatory arthritis teams: A social network perspective.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emma DuresFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. emma2.dures@uwe.ac.uk.
Sarah HewlettFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Nicholas AmblerPain Management Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Remona JenkinsAcademic Rheumatology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Joyce ClarkeAcademic Rheumatology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Rachael Gooberman-HillSchool of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of the West of England · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-management of inflammatory arthritis (IA) requires patients to address the impact of symptoms, treatment, and the psychosocial consequences of a long term condition. There are several possible mechanisms for facilitating self-management, including patient-clinician interactions in routine consultations. This requires patients to collaborate in their healthcare, and clinicians to specifically encourage and help patients to do so. To design training that enables clinicians to support patients to be actively involved and self-manage requires understanding both patients' and clinicians' perspectives about what is important and feasible. Previous research explored the perspectives of clinicians who had undertaken brief training which they were putting into practice in their routine consultations. This study explored the perspectives of patients attending those routine consultations to identify aspects of the interaction that influenced collaboration and self-management.

methodsNineteen patients with IA who had attended a routine consultation with a rheumatology clinician at one of four hospitals in England took part in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed, anonymised and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsThree themes encompass participants' thoughts about interactions that facilitated collaboration in consultations and their ability to self-manage their IA: first, patients and clinicians viewing care as a shared endeavour, including patients responding actively to their IA and clinicians exploring and negotiating with patients; second, the need for clinicians to understand the challenges faced by patients, appreciate the impact of IA and focus on patients' priorities; and third, clinicians using an open communication style, including the use of non-didactic, patient-centred approaches. A fourth theme was perceived benefits of actively engaging in consultations, including increased confidence to deal with the impact of IA and greater acceptance of a long term condition.

conclusionsPatients perceive that self-management can be facilitated when clinicians and patients view healthcare as a shared responsibility, underpinned by clinicians as experts in the disease and patients as experts in living with it. Clinicians can support patients' self-management by using non-didactic communication skills to identify patients' priorities, and to prompt patients to problem-solve and share in setting the consultation agenda. This should inform skills-training for rheumatology clinicians.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePerceptionPhysician-Patient RelationsReferral and ConsultationRheumatologySelf CareAdultAgedArthritisCommunicationEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicCommunicationHealth services researchPatient-clinician collaborationPatient perspectiveQualitativeSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID26980141
PMCPMC4793532
OpenAlexW2298305787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.