Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26979960›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

TFE and Spt4/5 open and close the RNA polymerase clamp during the transcription cycle.

Sarah Schulz, Andreas Gietl, Katherine Smollett, Philip Tinnefeld, Finn Werner, Dina Grohmann

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CDK9 keeps RNA polymerase II on track.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Archaeal transcription.Transcription · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah SchulzPhysikalische und Theoretische Chemie-NanoBioSciences, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany;
Andreas GietlPhysikalische und Theoretische Chemie-NanoBioSciences, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany;
Katherine SmollettRNA Polymerase Laboratory, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom;
Philip TinnefeldPhysikalische und Theoretische Chemie-NanoBioSciences, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany; Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany; Laboratory for Emerging Nanometrology (LENA), Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Finn WernerRNA Polymerase Laboratory, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; f.werner@ucl.ac.uk dina.grohmann@ur.de.
Dina GrohmannPhysikalische und Theoretische Chemie-NanoBioSciences, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany; f.werner@ucl.ac.uk dina.grohmann@ur.de.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E008232/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 079351/Z/06/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription is an intrinsically dynamic process and requires the coordinated interplay of RNA polymerases (RNAPs) with nucleic acids and transcription factors. Classical structural biology techniques have revealed detailed snapshots of a subset of conformational states of the RNAP as they exist in crystals. A detailed view of the conformational space sampled by the RNAP and the molecular mechanisms of the basal transcription factors E (TFE) and Spt4/5 through conformational constraints has remained elusive. We monitored the conformational changes of the flexible clamp of the RNAP by combining a fluorescently labeled recombinant 12-subunit RNAP system with single-molecule FRET measurements. We measured and compared the distances across the DNA binding channel of the archaeal RNAP. Our results show that the transition of the closed to the open initiation complex, which occurs concomitant with DNA melting, is coordinated with an opening of the RNAP clamp that is stimulated by TFE. We show that the clamp in elongation complexes is modulated by the nontemplate strand and by the processivity factor Spt4/5, both of which stimulate transcription processivity. Taken together, our results reveal an intricate network of interactions within transcription complexes between RNAP, transcription factors, and nucleic acids that allosterically modulate the RNAP during the transcription cycle.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticArchaeal ProteinsBase SequenceCrystallography, X-RayDNA, ArchaealDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferMethanocaldococcusMolecular Sequence DataNucleotidesPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein ConformationTranscriptional Elongation FactorsTranscription FactorsArchaeal ProteinsDNA, ArchaealDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesNucleotidesTranscriptional Elongation FactorsTranscription FactorsarchaeaclampRNA polymerasesingle-molecule FRETtranscription

Identifiers

PMID26979960
PMCPMC4822635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.