Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26979755›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Rapid genomic changes in Drosophila melanogaster adapting to desiccation stress in an experimental evolution system.

Lin Kang, Dau Dayal Aggarwal, Eugenia Rashkovetsky, Abraham B Korol, Pawel Michalak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Natural alleles at theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic divergence and adaptive convergence inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lin KangBiocomplexity Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Dau Dayal AggarwalInstitute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Abba Khoushy Ave 199, Haifa, Israel.
Eugenia RashkovetskyInstitute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Abba Khoushy Ave 199, Haifa, Israel.
Abraham B KorolInstitute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Abba Khoushy Ave 199, Haifa, Israel.
Pawel MichalakBiocomplexity Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. pawel@vbi.vt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperimental evolution studies, coupled with whole genome resequencing and advances in bioinformatics, have become a powerful tool for exploring how populations respond to selection at the genome-wide level, complementary to genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and linkage mapping experiments as strategies to connect genotype and phenotype. In this experiment, we analyzed genomes of Drosophila melanogaster from lines evolving under long-term directional selection for increased desiccation resistance in comparison with control (no-selection) lines.

resultsWe demonstrate that adaptive responses to desiccation stress have exerted extensive footprints on the genomes, manifested through a high degree of fixation of alleles in surrounding neighborhoods of eroded heterozygosity. These patterns were highly convergent across replicates, consistent with signatures of 'soft' selective sweeps, where multiple alleles present as standing genetic variation become beneficial and sweep through the replicate populations at the same time. Albeit much less frequent, we also observed line-unique sweep regions with zero or near-zero heterozygosity, consistent with classic, or 'hard', sweeps, where novel rather than pre-existing adaptive mutations may have been driven to fixation. Genes responsible for cuticle and protein deubiquitination seemed to be central to these selective sweeps. High divergence within coding sequences between selected and control lines was also reflected by significant results of the McDonald-Kreitman and Ka/Ks tests, showing that as many as 347 genes may have been under positive selection.

conclusionsDesiccation stress, a common challenge to many organisms inhabiting dry environments, proves to be a very potent selecting factor having a big impact on genome diversity.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, InsectStress, PhysiologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAllelesAnimalsDehydrationDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenetic VariationGenotypeMaleMutationSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNADesiccation stressDrosophilaEvolutionary genomicsExperimental evolutionRapid adaptationSelective sweep

Identifiers

PMID26979755
PMCPMC4791783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.