Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26979652›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2016

Serial Percent Free Prostate Specific Antigen in Combination with Prostate Specific Antigen for Population Based Early Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Donna Pauler Ankerst, Jonathan Gelfond, Martin Goros, Jesus Herrera, Andreas Strobl, Ian M Thompson, Javier Hernandez, Robin J Leach

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Combining Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Prostate-Specific Antigen to Differentiate Between Malignant and Benign Prostate Lesions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Prostate cancer screening-when to start and how to screen?Translational andrology and urology · 2018
    Review
  11. Recommandations de l'Association des urologues du Canada sur le dépistage et le diagnostic précoce du cancer de la prostate.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donna Pauler AnkerstDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Department of Mathematics, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: ankerst@tum.de.
Jonathan GelfondDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Martin GorosDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Jesus HerreraDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Andreas StroblDepartment of Mathematics, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany.
Ian M ThompsonDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Javier HernandezDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Robin J LeachDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Lei Zheng · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
SAN ANTONIO CENTER OF BIOMARKERS OF RISK FOR PROSTATE CAU01CA086402 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LEACH, ROBIN JEAN, THOMPSON, IAN M. · 2000 to 2018
$33.1M
San Antonio OAIC - Research Education Component (REC)P30AG044271 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Adam Salmon, Elena Volpi · 2015 to 2026
$14.1M
PROMISS - Prostate Modeling to Identify Surveillance StrategiesR01CA183570 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ETZIONI, RUTH D, LIN, DANIEL W. · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
Dynamic, multi-cohort prediction modeling of prostate biopsy outcomeR01CA179115 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ANKERST, DONNA PAULER, VICKERS, ANDREW J · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Improving prostate biopsy efficiency: The finasteride challenge testR01CA138627 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI HERNANDEZ, JAVIER, LEACH, ROBIN JEAN · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138627NCI NIH HHS R01 CA179115NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183570NCI NIH HHS U01 CA086402NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe characterized the diagnostic properties of serial percent free prostate specific antigen in relation to prostate specific antigen in a multiethnic, multiracial cohort of healthy men. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 6,982 percent free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen measurements were obtained from participants in a greater than 12-year Texas screening study comprising 1,625 men who never underwent biopsy, 497 who underwent 1 or more biopsies negative for prostate cancer and 61 diagnosed with prostate cancer. We evaluated the ROC AUC of percent free prostate specific antigen and the proportion of patients with fluctuating values across multiple visits determined according to 2 thresholds (less than 15% vs 25%). The proportion of cancer cases in which percent free prostate specific antigen indicated a positive test before prostate specific antigen greater than 4 ng/ml did and the number of negative biopsies that would have been spared by negative percent free prostate specific antigen test results were calculated.

resultsPercent free prostate specific antigen fluctuated around its threshold of less than 25% (less than 15%) in 38.3% (78.1%), 42.2% (20.9%), and 11.4% (25.7%) of patients never biopsied, and with negative and positive biopsies, respectively. At the same thresholds, percent free prostate specific antigen tested positive earlier than prostate specific antigen in 71.4% and 34.2% of cancer cases, respectively. Among men with multiple negative biopsies and PSA greater than 4 ng/ml, percent free PSA would have tested negative in 31.6% and 65.8%, respectively.

conclusionsPercent free prostate specific antigen should accompany prostate specific antigen testing to potentially spare unnecessary biopsies or detect cancer earlier. When near the threshold, both tests should be repeated due to commonly observed fluctuation.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsROC CurveProstate-Specific Antigenbiopsydiagnosismass screeningprostate-specific antigenprostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26979652
PMCPMC4969186
OpenAlexW2394328144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.