SynthesisHerz2016
Colchicine in addition to conventional therapy for pericarditis recurrence : An update meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Herz, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Updates on Pathophysiology of Pericarditis to Guide Development of Therapeutics.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Colchicine and Anti-Interleukin-1 Agents in Recurrent Pericarditis: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Novel Pathophysiological, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Concepts in Acute and Recurrent Pericarditis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Postpericardiotomy syndrome after cardiac surgery.Annals of medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the use of colchicine and conventional therapy for reducing the recurrence of pericarditis in patients with acute pericarditis or post-pericardiotomy syndrome. However, the benefits of these treatments are variable.
methodsStudies were retrieved from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the EMBASE database.
resultsWe identified nine RCTs with 1832 patients and a mean follow-up of 13.1 months. Overall, colchicine therapy significantly decreased the risk of pericarditis recurrence (odds ratio, OR 0.42; 95 % confidence interval, CI 0.33-0.52; P < 0.001; I
conclusionColchicine significantly decreases the rate of pericarditis recurrence, regardless of prednisone use and the cause of pericarditis. Larger studies are needed to confirm this effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.