Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26979392›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2016

Blocking Indolamine-2,3-Dioxygenase Rebound Immune Suppression Boosts Antitumor Effects of Radio-Immunotherapy in Murine Models and Spontaneous Canine Malignancies.

Arta M Monjazeb, Michael S Kent, Steven K Grossenbacher, Christine Mall, Anthony E Zamora, Annie Mirsoian, Mingyi Chen, Amir Kol, Stephen L Shiao, Abhinav Reddy and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Arta M MonjazebDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California. ammonjazeb@ucdavis.edu.
Michael S KentDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California.
Steven K GrossenbacherDepartment of Dermatology, UC Davis Health Sciences, Sacramento, California.
Christine MallDepartment of Dermatology, UC Davis Health Sciences, Sacramento, California.
Anthony E ZamoraDepartment of Dermatology, UC Davis Health Sciences, Sacramento, California.
Annie MirsoianDepartment of Dermatology, UC Davis Health Sciences, Sacramento, California.
Mingyi ChenDepartment of Pathology, UC Davis Health Sciences, Sacramento, California.
Amir KolDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California.
Stephen L ShiaoDepartments of Radiation Oncology and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Abhinav ReddyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.
Julian R PerksDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.
William T N CulpDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California.
Ellen E SpargerDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California.
Robert J CanterDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.
Gail D SckiselDepartment of Dermatology, UC Davis Health Sciences, Sacramento, California.
William J MurphyDepartment of Dermatology, UC Davis Health Sciences, Sacramento, California. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.
UC Davis Health · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Davis · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Gina M Dayton · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
IT by CD40 stimulation and IL2 against renal cell carcinR01CA095572 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI MURPHY, WILLIAM JOSEPH · 2002 to 2017
$4.0M
UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterKL2RR024144 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2006 to 2011
$3.1M
The Impact of Macrophage Polarization on the Efficacy of Radiation TherapyK08CA191139 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHIAO, STEPHEN L. · 2015 to 2019
$884k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA191139NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095572NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious studies demonstrate that intratumoral CpG immunotherapy in combination with radiotherapy acts as an in-situ vaccine inducing antitumor immune responses capable of eradicating systemic disease. Unfortunately, most patients fail to respond. We hypothesized that immunotherapy can paradoxically upregulate immunosuppressive pathways, a phenomenon we term "rebound immune suppression," limiting clinical responses. We further hypothesized that the immunosuppressive enzyme indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is a mechanism of rebound immune suppression and that IDO blockade would improve immunotherapy efficacy. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe examined the efficacy and immunologic effects of a novel triple therapy consisting of local radiotherapy, intratumoral CpG, and systemic IDO blockade in murine models and a pilot canine clinical trial.

resultsIn murine models, we observed marked increase in intratumoral IDO expression after treatment with radiotherapy, CpG, or other immunotherapies. The addition of IDO blockade to radiotherapy + CpG decreased IDO activity, reduced tumor growth, and reduced immunosuppressive factors, such as regulatory T cells in the tumor microenvironment. This triple combination induced systemic antitumor effects, decreasing metastases, and improving survival in a CD8(+) T-cell-dependent manner. We evaluated this novel triple therapy in a canine clinical trial, because spontaneous canine malignancies closely reflect human cancer. Mirroring our mouse studies, the therapy was well tolerated, reduced intratumoral immunosuppression, and induced robust systemic antitumor effects.

conclusionsThese results suggest that IDO maintains immune suppression in the tumor after therapy, and IDO blockade promotes a local antitumor immune response with systemic consequences. The efficacy and limited toxicity of this strategy are attractive for clinical translation. Clin Cancer Res; 22(17); 4328-40. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Immunosuppression TherapyAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDogsEnzyme ActivationFemaleImmunomodulationIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-DioxygenaseMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceNeoplasmsOligodeoxyribonucleotidesRadioimmunotherapyT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-DioxygenaseOligodeoxyribonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID26979392
PMCPMC5010514
OpenAlexW2298272175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.