Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26979391›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2016

Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Hypersensitivity in Aggressive Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Keith W Pratz, Brian D Koh, Anand G Patel, Karen S Flatten, Weijie Poh, James G Herman, Robert Dilley, Maria I Harrell, B Douglas Smith, Judith E Karp and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exposure-Response of Veliparib to Inform Phase II Trial Design in Refractory or Relapsed Patients with Hematological Malignancies.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Advances in Anti-Cancer Activities of Flavonoids inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis.Current treatment options in oncology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keith W PratzDepartment of Oncology and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Kpratz1@jhmi.edu.
Brian D KohDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Anand G PatelDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Karen S FlattenDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Weijie PohDepartment of Oncology and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
James G HermanDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robert DilleyDepartment of Oncology and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Maria I HarrellDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
B Douglas SmithDepartment of Oncology and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Judith E KarpDepartment of Oncology and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elizabeth M SwisherDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Michael A McDevittDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Scott H KaufmannDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Department of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
The Johns Hopkins Translational Science Team for the ET-CTNUM1CA186691 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jan Hendrik Beumer, Michael A Carducci · 2014 to 2026
$21.9M
TRAINING GRANT IN CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYT32GM008685 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Liewei Wang · 1998 to 2026
$8.2M
Medical Scientist Traning Program at Mayo ClinicT32GM065841 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KAUFMANN, SCOTT H, SCHIMMENTI, LISA A · 2003 to 2022
$5.8M
Phase 2 Clinical Trials Program for Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials NetworkUM1CA186686 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ADJEI, ALEX A. · 2014 to 2019
$5.3M
Wisconsin and New Jersey Alliance in Precision Experimental TherapeuticsUM1CA186716 · NCI · RBHS -CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY · PI JABBOUR, SALMA, LIU, GLENN · 2014 to 2019
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186686NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186691NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186716NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008685NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDNA repair defects have been previously reported in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Inhibitors of PARP have shown activity in solid tumors with defects in homologous recombination (HR). This study was performed to assess MPN sensitivity to PARP inhibitors ex vivo EXPERIMENTAL

designHR pathway integrity in circulating myeloid cells was evaluated by assessing the formation of RAD51 foci after treatment with ionizing radiation or PARP inhibitors. Sensitivity of MPN erythroid and myeloid progenitors to PARP inhibitors was evaluated using colony formation assays.

resultsSix of 14 MPN primary samples had reduced formation of RAD51 foci after exposure to ionizing radiation, suggesting impaired HR. This phenotype was not associated with a specific MPN subtype, JAK2 mutation status, or karyotype. MPN samples showed increased sensitivity to the PARP inhibitors veliparib and olaparib compared with normal myeloid progenitors. This hypersensitivity, which was most pronounced in samples deficient in DNA damage-induced RAD51 foci, was observed predominantly in samples from patients with diagnoses of chronic myelogenous leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, or unspecified myelodysplastic/MPN overlap syndromes.

conclusionsLike other neoplasms with HR defects, MPNs exhibit PARP inhibitor hypersensitivity compared with normal marrow. These results suggest that further preclinical and possibly clinical study of PARP inhibitors in MPNs is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 22(15); 3894-902. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBenzimidazolesBRCA1 ProteinDNA DamageDNA MethylationDNA RepairDrug HypersensitivityDrug ToleranceGenomicsHumansJanus Kinase 2MutationMyeloproliferative DisordersPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsRad51 RecombinaseAntineoplastic AgentsBenzimidazolesBRCA1 ProteinJAK2 protein, humanJanus Kinase 2Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsRad51 Recombinaseveliparib

Identifiers

PMID26979391
PMCPMC5041297
OpenAlexW2296857019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.