Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26979250›Full record

ReviewArchives of disease in childhood2016

Safe and effective pharmacotherapy in infants and preschool children: importance of formulation aspects.

Diana A van Riet-Nales, Alfred F A M Schobben, Herman Vromans, Toine C G Egberts, Carin M A Rademaker

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of disease in childhood, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Formulation and development of paediatric orally disintegrating carbamazepine tablets.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Diana A van Riet-NalesChemical Pharmaceutical Assessment (CFB), Medicines Evaluation Board in the Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Faculty of Science, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alfred F A M SchobbenChemical Pharmaceutical Assessment (CFB), Medicines Evaluation Board in the Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Faculty of Science, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Herman VromansDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Faculty of Science, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht, The Netherlands Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Toine C G EgbertsDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Faculty of Science, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht, The Netherlands Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Carin M A RademakerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NLMedicines Evaluation Board · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe and effective paediatric pharmacotherapy requires careful evaluation of the type of drug substance, the necessary dose and the age-appropriateness of the formulation. Generally, the younger the child, the more the attention that is required. For decades, there has been a general lack of (authorised) formulations that children are able to and willing to take. Moreover, little was known on the impact of pharmaceutical aspects on the age-appropriateness of a paediatric medicine. As a result of legislative incentives, such knowledge is increasingly becoming available. It has become evident that rapidly dissolving tablets with a diameter of 2 mm (mini-tablets) can be used in preterm neonates and non-rapidly dissolving 2 mm mini-tablets in infants from 6 months of age. In addition, uncoated 4 mm mini-tablets can be used in infants from the age of 1 year. Also, there is some evidence that children prefer mini-tablets over a powder, suspension or syrup. Other novel types of age-appropriate oral formulations such as orodispersible films may further add to the treatment possibilities. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge on oral formulations for infants and preschool children, the advantages and disadvantages of the different types of dosage forms and the age groups by which these can likely be used.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAge FactorsChemistry, PharmaceuticalChild, PreschoolDosage FormsDrug TherapyExcipientsHumansInfantPharmaceutical PreparationsSolutionsTabletsDosage FormsExcipientsPharmaceutical PreparationsSolutionsTabletsadministration, oralchildformulationmini-tablettehnology, pharmaceutical

Identifiers

PMID26979250
PMCPMC4941170
OpenAlexW2297863531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.