Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26978262›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Validation Study: Response-Predictive Gene Expression Profiling of Glioma Progenitor Cells In Vitro.

Sylvia Moeckel, Arabel Vollmann-Zwerenz, Martin Proescholdt, Alexander Brawanski, Markus J Riemenschneider, Ulrich Bogdahn, Anja-Katrin Bosserhoff, Rainer Spang, Peter Hau

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Drug Repurposing of Metabolic Agents in Malignant Glioma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sylvia MoeckelDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Arabel Vollmann-ZwerenzDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin ProescholdtDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Alexander BrawanskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Markus J RiemenschneiderDepartment of Neuropathology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Ulrich BogdahnDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Anja-Katrin BosserhoffInstitute of Biochemistry (Emil Fischer-Zentrum), Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Rainer SpangInstitute for Functional Genomics, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Peter HauDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a previous publication we introduced a novel approach to identify genes that hold predictive information about treatment outcome. A linear regression model was fitted by using the least angle regression algorithm (LARS) with the expression profiles of a construction set of 18 glioma progenitor cells enhanced for brain tumor initiating cells (BTIC) before and after in vitro treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor Sunitinib. Profiles from treated progenitor cells allowed predicting therapy-induced impairment of proliferation in vitro. Prediction performance was validated in leave one out cross validation.

methodsIn this study, we used an additional validation set of 18 serum-free short-term treated in vitro cell cultures to test the predictive properties of the signature in an independent cohort. We assessed proliferation rates together with transcriptome-wide expression profiles after Sunitinib treatment of each individual cell culture, following the methods of the previous publication.

resultsWe confirmed treatment-induced expression changes in our validation set, but our signature failed to predict proliferation inhibition. Neither re-calculation of the combined dataset with all 36 BTIC cultures nor separation of samples into TCGA subclasses did generate a proliferation prediction.

conclusionAlthough the gene signature published from our construction set exhibited good prediction accuracy in cross validation, we were not able to validate the signature in an independent validation data set. Reasons could be regression to the mean, the moderate numbers of samples, or too low differences in the response to proliferation inhibition in the validation set. At this stage and based on the presented results, we conclude that the signature does not warrant further developmental steps towards clinical application.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCell ProliferationGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGliomaHumansIndolesMicroarray AnalysisNeoplastic Stem CellsPyrrolesSunitinibIndolesPyrrolesSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID26978262
PMCPMC4792439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.