Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26977402›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2016

Mussels (Perna perna) as bioindicator of environmental contamination by Cryptosporidium species with zoonotic potential.

Geisi Ferreira Mariné Oliveira, Melissa Carvalho Machado do Couto, Marcelo de Freitas Lima, Teresa Cristina Bergamo do Bomfim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Identification ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2024
    Article
  5. Source tracking of fecal contamination in Asian green mussels (Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Potential Risk of Three Zoonotic Protozoa (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Geisi Ferreira Mariné OliveiraEducacional Foundation Rosemar Pimentel, University Center Geraldo Di Biase - Barra do Piraí, Brazil.
Melissa Carvalho Machado do CoutoFederal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Institute of Biology, Department of Physiological Sciences, Brazil.
Marcelo de Freitas LimaFederal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro - Chemistry Department, Institute of Exact Sciences, Brazil.
Teresa Cristina Bergamo do BomfimFederal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Veterinary Institute, Department of Animal Parasitology, BR 465, Km 07, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro 23.890-000 Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sources of contamination such as animal feces runoff, organic fertilizer application, and the release of partially treated or untreated sewage can lead to the contamination of aquatic environments by Cryptosporidium spp. The quality of mussels as food is closely related to the sanitary conditions of the marine environment where these bivalves are found. Marine mollusks are filter feeders that are able to retain Cryptosporidium oocysts in their tissue, thus functioning as bioindicators. A total of 72 pooled mussel samples of the species Perna perna were collected at two sites (A and B) in the municipality of Mangaratiba, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Sampling involved removal of 30 mussels, from each collection site every month for one year. The 30 mussels from each sampling were then allocated into three groups of 10. Two Cryptosporidium spp. genes (18S and GP60) were targeted for DNA amplification from the samples obtained. After purification, all of the products obtained were sequenced and phylogenetic analyses were performed. Of the 72 samples analyzed using the nested-PCR for the 18S gene target, 29.2% were positive for the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. Of these samples, 52.4% were collected at site A (ie 11/21) and 47.6% at site B (ie 10/21). The 18S genes of all the samples considered positive for Cryptosporidium spp. were sequenced, and the following three species were identified: Cryptosporidium parvum, C. meleagridis, and C. andersoni. Three distinct C. parvum subtypes (IIaA19G2R2; IIaA20G2R2; IIaA20G3R2) were identified using the GP60 gene. More studies to evaluate the zoonotic potential of this species should be performed as both sampling locations contain human and/or animal fecal contaminants.

Indexed as

18SCryptosporidiumEnvironmental indicatorGP60Marine bivalve

Identifiers

PMID26977402
PMCPMC4781961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.