Erratum: 0.5 gigapixel microscopy using a flatbed scanner: erratum.

Xiaoze Ou, Guoan Zheng, Changhuei Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readPublished Erratum

In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

A modular, open-source, slide-scanning microscope for diagnostic applications in resource-constrained settings.PloS one · 2018
Article
A novel optical microscope for imaging large embryos and tissue volumes with sub-cellular resolution throughout.eLife · 2016
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

Erratum for
0.5 gigapixel microscopy using a flatbed scanner.2013

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoze OuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA.

Guoan ZhengBiomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA; Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.

Changhuei YangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA.

California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When one uses USAF target to calibrate the resolution of an imaging system, the periodicity of the smallest resolvable line should be used to define the limit. However, in the original paper, the line width of the resolution target was used to characterize the resolution of our microscope system, resulting in an overestimation of the performance of the imaging system. In this erratum, we correct the parts that state incorrect resolution and also re-evaluate the performance of our micoscope.[This corrects the article on p. 1 in vol. 5, PMID: 24466471.].

Indexed as

(120.4820) Optical systems(170.0180) Microscopy(170.4730) Optical pathology

Identifiers

PMID26977368

DOI10.1364/BOE.7.000646

PMCPMC4771477

OpenAlexW2431110803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.