Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26977355›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2016

Assessing the imaging performance of light sheet microscopies in highly scattering tissues.

A K Glaser, Y Wang, J T C Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mesolens imaging in microbiology.Essays in biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Scattering oblique plane microscopy forBiomedical optics express · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dual-axis confocal microscopy for point-of-care pathology.IEEE journal of selected topics in quantum electronics : a publication of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-optics Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A K GlaserDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Y WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J T C LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Line-scanned MEMS-based dual-axis confocal microscopy to detect oral lesions in vR01DE023497 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, JONATHAN T.C. · 2012 to 2014
$2.4M
Intraoperative confocal microscopy for quantitative delineation of low-grade glioR01CA175391 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, JONATHAN T.C., SANAI, NADER · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175391NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light sheet microscopy (LSM) has emerged as an optical-imaging method for high spatiotemporal volumetric imaging of relatively transparent samples. While this capability has allowed the technique to be highly impactful in fields such as developmental biology, applications involving highly scattering thick tissues have been largely unexplored. Herein, we employ Monte Carlo simulations to explore the use of LSM for imaging turbid media. In particular, due to its similarity to dual-axis confocal (DAC) microscopy, we compare LSM performance to point-scanned (PS-DAC) and line-scanned (LS-DAC) dual-axis confocal microscopy techniques that have been previously shown to produce high-quality images at round-trip optical lengths of ~9 - 10 and ~3 - 4 respectively. The results of this study indicate that LSM using widefield collection (WF-LSM) provides comparable performance to LS-DAC in thick tissues, due to the fact that they both utilize an illumination beam focused in one dimension (i.e. a line or sheet). On the other hand, LSM using confocal line detection (CL-LSM) is more analogous to PS-DAC microscopy, in which the illumination beam is focused in two dimensions to a point. The imaging depth of LSM is only slightly inferior to DAC (~2 - 3 and ~6 - 7 optical lengths for WF-LSM and CL-LSM respectively) due to the use of a lower numerical aperture (NA) illumination beam for extended imaging along the illumination axis. Therefore, we conclude that the ability to image deeply is dictated most by the confocality of the microscope technique. In addition, we find that imaging resolution is mostly dependent on the collection NA, and is relatively invariant to imaging depth in a homogeneous scattering medium. Our results indicate that superficial imaging of highly scattering tissues using light sheet microscopy is possible.

Indexed as

(110.0113) Imaging through turbid media(170.1790) Confocal microscopy(170.2520) Fluorescence microscopy(170.3880) Medical and biological imaging(170.5810) Scanning microscopy

Identifiers

PMID26977355
PMCPMC4771464
OpenAlexW2289520642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.