ArticleBiomedical optics express2016
Miniature in vivo MEMS-based line-scanned dual-axis confocal microscope for point-of-care pathology.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Miniature line-scanned dual-axis confocal microscope for versatile clinical use.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Intraoperative Imaging and Optical Visualization Techniques for Brain Tumor Resection: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Miniature side-view dual axes confocal endomicroscope for repetitive in vivo imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Nondestructive 3D Pathology with Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy for Translational Research and Clinical Assays.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2023Review
- High-speed light-sheet microscopy for the in-situ acquisition of volumetric histological images of living tissue.Nature biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Handheld laser scanning microscope catheter for real-time andBiomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Performance tradeoffs for single- and dual-objective open-top light-sheet microscope designs: a simulation-based analysis.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Real-time video mosaicking to guide handheld in vivo microscopy.Journal of biophotonics · 2020Article
- Video-Mosaicked Handheld Dual-Axis Confocal Microscopy of Gliomas: AnFrontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Label-free in vivo pathology of human epithelia with a high-speed handheld dual-axis confocal microscope.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
- Handheld line-scanned dual-axis confocal microscope with pistoned MEMS actuation for flat-field fluorescence imaging.Optics letters · 2019Article
- Visualization technologies for 5-ALA-based fluorescence-guided surgeries.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Review
- Optical-sectioning microscopy of protoporphyrin IX fluorescence in human gliomas: standardization and quantitative comparison with histology.Journal of biomedical optics · 2017Article
- Bessel-beam illumination in dual-axis confocal microscopy mitigates resolution degradation caused by refractive heterogeneities.Journal of biophotonics · 2017Article
- Multiplexed Optical Imaging of Tumor-Directed Nanoparticles: A Review of Imaging Systems and Approaches.Nanotheranostics · 2017Review
- Reflectance confocal microscopy of skin in vivo: From bench to bedside.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2017Review
- Visualizing epithelial expression of EGFR in vivo with distal scanning side-viewing confocal endomicroscope.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Gigapixel surface imaging of radical prostatectomy specimens for comprehensive detection of cancer-positive surgical margins using structured illumination microscopy.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Assessing the imaging performance of light sheet microscopies in highly scattering tissues.Biomedical optics express · 2016Article
- Dual-axis confocal microscopy for point-of-care pathology.IEEE journal of selected topics in quantum electronics : a publication of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-optics SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a need for miniature optical-sectioning microscopes to enable in vivo interrogation of tissues as a real-time and noninvasive alternative to gold-standard histopathology. Such devices could have a transformative impact for the early detection of cancer as well as for guiding tumor-resection procedures. Miniature confocal microscopes have been developed by various researchers and corporations to enable optical sectioning of highly scattering tissues, all of which have necessitated various trade-offs in size, speed, depth selectivity, field of view, resolution, image contrast, and sensitivity. In this study, a miniature line-scanned (LS) dual-axis confocal (DAC) microscope, with a 12-mm diameter distal tip, has been developed for clinical point-of-care pathology. The dual-axis architecture has demonstrated an advantage over the conventional single-axis confocal configuration for reducing background noise from out-of-focus and multiply scattered light. The use of line scanning enables fast frame rates (16 frames/sec is demonstrated here, but faster rates are possible), which mitigates motion artifacts of a hand-held device during clinical use. We have developed a method to actively align the illumination and collection beams in a DAC microscope through the use of a pair of rotatable alignment mirrors. Incorporation of a custom objective lens, with a small form factor for in vivo clinical use, enables our device to achieve an optical-sectioning thickness and lateral resolution of 2.0 and 1.1 microns respectively. Validation measurements with reflective targets, as well as in vivo and ex vivo images of tissues, demonstrate the clinical potential of this high-speed optical-sectioning microscopy device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.