Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26977321›Full record

ReviewProstate cancer2016

Fortifying the Treatment of Prostate Cancer with Physical Activity.

Colin E Champ, Lanie Francis, Rainer J Klement, Roger Dickerman, Ryan P Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prostate cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Biomarkers Associated With Tumor Ki67 andFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Tracking steps in oncology: the time is now.Cancer management and research · 2018
    Review
  8. Epidemiology and biology of physical activity and cancer recurrence.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Colin E ChampDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15215, USA; Department of Integrative Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
Lanie FrancisDepartment of Integrative Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
Rainer J KlementDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, 97422 Schweinfurt, Germany.
Roger DickermanRelentless Fitness, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.
Ryan P SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15215, USA.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USLeopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, significant data have shown that obese men experience a survival detriment after treatment for prostate cancer. While methods to combat obesity are of utmost importance for the prostate cancer patient, newer data reveal the overall metabolic improvements that accompany increased activity levels and intense exercise beyond weight loss. Along these lines, a plethora of data have shown improvement in prostate cancer-specific outcomes after treatment accompanied with these activity levels. This review discusses the metabolic mechanisms in which increased activity levels and exercise can help improve both outcomes for men treated for prostate cancer while lowering the side effects of treatment.

Identifiers

PMID26977321
PMCPMC4764749
OpenAlexW2265932920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.