Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26977103›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

A patient-centered system in a provider-centered world: challenges of incorporating post-discharge wound data into practice.

Patrick C Sanger, Andrea Hartzler, Ross J Lordon, Cheryl Al Armstrong, William B Lober, Heather L Evans, Wanda Pratt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Optimizing an Outpatient mHealth Intervention for Children with Burns: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Articulation of postsurgical patient discharges: coordinating care transitions from hospital to home.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A scoping review of qualitative research in JAMIA: past contributions and opportunities for future work.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick C SangerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA psanger@uw.edu.
Andrea HartzlerGroup Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ross J LordonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cheryl Al ArmstrongDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
William B LoberDepartments of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, and Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Heather L EvansDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Wanda PrattInformation School and Department of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Institute of Translational Health SciencesUL1TR000423 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$49.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe proposed Meaningful Use Stage 3 recommendations require healthcare providers to accept patient-generated health data (PGHD) by 2017. Yet, we know little about the tensions that arise in supporting the needs of both patients and providers in this context. We sought to examine these tensions when designing a novel, patient-centered technology - mobile Post-Operative Wound Evaluator (mPOWEr) - that uses PGHD for post-discharge surgical wound monitoring. MATERIALS AND

methodsAs part of the iterative design process of mPOWEr, we conducted semistructured interviews and think-aloud sessions using mockups with surgical patients and providers. We asked participants how mPOWEr could enhance the current post-discharge process for surgical patients, then used grounded theory to develop themes related to conflicts and agreements between patients and providers.

resultsWe identified four areas of agreement: providing contextual metadata, accessible and actionable data presentation, building on existing sociotechnical systems, and process transparency. We identified six areas of conflict, with patients preferring: more flexibility in data input, frequent data transfer, text-based communication, patient input in provider response prioritization, timely and reliable provider responses, and definitive diagnoses. DISCUSSION: We present design implications and potential solutions to the identified conflicts for each theme, illustrated using our work on mPOWEr. Our experience highlights the importance of bringing a variety of stakeholders, including patients, into the design process for PGHD applications.

conclusionWe have identified critical barriers to integrating PGHD into clinical care and describe design implications to help address these barriers. Our work informs future efforts to ensure the smooth integration of essential PGHD into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Self ReportSurgical Wound InfectionTelemedicineText MessagingAdultAftercareAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsMonitoring, PhysiologicPatient-Centered Caredissent and disputesmobile healthpatient-centered carepatient engagementsurgical wound infection

Identifiers

PMID26977103
PMCPMC6375197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.