Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26977086›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016

Regression discontinuity designs in healthcare research.

Atheendar S Venkataramani, Jacob Bor, Anupam B Jena

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. IMI-2025 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atheendar S VenkataramaniDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; and Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jacob BorDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Anupam B JenaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital; and National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA jena@hcp.med.harvard.edu.

Funding

Physician Determinants of Health Care Spending, Quality, and Patient OutcomesDP5OD017897 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI JENA, ANUPAM BAPU · 2013 to 2017
$2.1M
NIH HHS 1DP5OD017897-01NIH HHS DP5 OD017897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic Research DesignRegression AnalysisData Interpretation, StatisticalDecision Support TechniquesHealth Services ResearchHumansModels, StatisticalPolicy Making

Identifiers

PMID26977086
PMCPMC6884311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.