Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26977064›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

The impact of Cenozoic cooling on assemblage diversity in planktonic foraminifera.

Isabel S Fenton, Paul N Pearson, Tom Dunkley Jones, Alexander Farnsworth, Daniel J Lunt, Paul Markwick, Andy Purvis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A deep-time perspective on the latitudinal diversity gradient.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Past and future decline of tropical pelagic biodiversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Towards a morphological metric of assemblage dynamics in the fossil record: a test case using planktonic foraminifera.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  15. A promising future for integrative biodiversity research: an increased role of scale-dependency and functional biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  16. The challenges to inferring the regulators of biodiversity in deep time.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isabel S FentonDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK isabel.fenton@nhm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7174-0725
Paul N PearsonSchool of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK.
Tom Dunkley JonesSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Alexander FarnsworthSchool of Geographical Sciences and Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK.
Daniel J LuntSchool of Geographical Sciences and Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK.
Paul MarkwickGetech Group plc. Elmete Hall, Elmete Lane, Leeds LS8 2LJ, UK.
Andy PurvisDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cenozoic planktonic foraminifera (PF) (calcareous zooplankton) have arguably the most detailed fossil record of any group. The quality of this record allows models of environmental controls on macroecology, developed for Recent assemblages, to be tested on intervals with profoundly different climatic conditions. These analyses shed light on the role of long-term global cooling in establishing the modern latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG)--one of the most powerful generalizations in biogeography and macroecology. Here, we test the transferability of environment-diversity models developed for modern PF assemblages to the Eocene epoch (approx. 56-34 Ma), a time of pronounced global warmth. Environmental variables from global climate models are combined with Recent environment-diversity models to predict Eocene richness gradients, which are then compared with observed patterns. The results indicate the modern LDG--lower richness towards the poles--developed through the Eocene. Three possible causes are suggested for the mismatch between statistical model predictions and data in the Early Eocene: the environmental estimates are inaccurate, the statistical model misses a relevant variable, or the intercorrelations among facets of diversity--e.g. richness, evenness, functional diversity--have changed over geological time. By the Late Eocene, environment-diversity relationships were much more similar to those found today.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiological EvolutionClimate ChangeForaminiferaFossilsPlanktonTime FactorsEoceneglobal climate modellatitudinal diversity gradientplanktonic foraminifera

Identifiers

PMID26977064
PMCPMC4810817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.