Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26976927›Full record

ReviewPractical neurology2016

British Neurotoxin Network recommendations for managing cervical dystonia in patients with a poor response to botulinum toxin.

Marie-Helene Marion, Miles Humberstone, Richard Grunewald, Sunil Wimalaratna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Practical neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marie-Helene MarionLondon BTX Centre, London, UK British Neurotoxin Network, Guildford, UK.
Miles HumberstoneDepartment of Neurology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK Department of Neurology, United Lincolnshire Hospitals, Lincoln, UK.
Richard GrunewaldDepartment of Neurology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT, Sheffield, UK.
Sunil WimalaratnaDepartment of Neurology, Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kettering, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections are an effective treatment for cervical dystonia. Approximately 20% of patients eventually stop BoNT treatment, mostly because of treatment failure. These recommendations review the different therapeutic interventions for optimising the treatment in secondary poor responder patients. Immunoresistance has become less common over the years, but the diagnosis has to be addressed with a frontalis test or an Extensor Digitorum Brevis test. In case of immunoresistance to BoNT-A, we discuss the place the different therapeutic options (BoNT-A holidays, BoNT-B injections, alternative BoNT-A injections, deep brain stimulation). When poor responders are not immunoresistant, they benefit from reviewing (1) injections technique with electromyography or ultrasound guidance, (2) muscles selection and (3) dose of BoNT. In addition, in both scenarios, a holistic approach including drug treatment, retraining and psychological support is valuable in the management of these complex and severe cervical dystonia.

Indexed as

Botulinum ToxinsBotulinum Toxins, Type ADystoniaElectromyographyHumansMuscle, SkeletalNeurotoxinsTorticollisBotulinum ToxinsBotulinum Toxins, Type AincobotulinumtoxinANeurotoxinsBNN guidelinesBOTULINUM TOXINBritish Neurotoxin Networkcervical dystoniapoor responders to treatment

Identifiers

PMID26976927
PMCPMC4975836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.