Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26976872›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Propensity Score Analysis of the Role of Initial Antifungal Therapy in the Outcome of Candida glabrata Bloodstream Infections.

M Puig-Asensio, M Fernández-Ruiz, J M Aguado, P Merino, D Lora-Pablos, J Guinea, P Martín-Dávila, M Cuenca-Estrella, B Almirante

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01236261 (Prospective Population Study on Candidemia in Spain), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01236261 completednot on this map

Prospective Population Study on Candidemia in Spain (Estudio Poblacional Prospectivo Sobre Candidemia en España)

TypeobservationalSponsorFundacion SEIMC-GESIDARan2013 to 2013Enrolled730ConditionsFungemiaArmsNon intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antifungal Resistance in Clinical Isolates ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

M Puig-AsensioInfectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Medicine Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0722-2218
M Fernández-RuizUnit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
J M AguadoUnit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
P MerinoClinical Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
D Lora-PablosClinical Research Unit, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
J GuineaClinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7901-8355
P Martín-DávilaInfectious Diseases Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigaciones Sanitarias (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
M Cuenca-EstrellaDepartment of Mycology, Spanish National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
B AlmiranteInfectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Medicine Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain balmirante@vhebron.net.
Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida glabrata isolates have reduced in vitro susceptibility to azoles, which raises concerns about the clinical effectiveness of fluconazole for treating bloodstream infection (BSI) by this Candida species. We aimed to evaluate whether the choice of initial antifungal treatment (fluconazole versus echinocandins or liposomal amphotericin B [L-AmB]-based regimens) has an impact on the outcome of C. glabrata BSI. We analyzed data from a prospective, multicenter, population-based surveillance program on candidemia conducted in 5 metropolitan areas of Spain (May 2010 to April 2011). Adult patients with an episode of C. glabrata BSI were included. The main outcomes were 14-day mortality and treatment failure (14-day mortality and/or persistent C. glabrata BSI for ≥48 h despite antifungal initiation). The impact of using fluconazole as initial antifungal treatment on the patients' prognosis was assessed by logistic regression analysis with the addition of a propensity score approach. A total of 94 patients with C. glabrata BSI were identified. Of these, 34 had received fluconazole and 35 had received an echinocandin/L-AmB-based regimen. Patients in the echinocandin/L-AmB group had poorer baseline clinical status than did those in the fluconazole group. Patients in the fluconazole group were more frequently (55.9% versus 28.6%) and much earlier (median time, 3 versus 7 days) switched to another antifungal regimen. Overall, 14-day mortality was 13% (9/69) and treatment failure 34.8% (24/69), with no significant differences between the groups. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for baseline characteristics by propensity score, fluconazole use was not associated with an unfavorable evolution (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for 14-day mortality, 1.16, with 95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.22 to 6.17; adjusted OR for treatment failure, 0.83, with 95% CI of 0.27 to 2.61). In conclusion, initial fluconazole treatment was not associated with a poorer outcome than that obtained with echinocandins/L-AmB regimens in patients with C. glabrata BSI. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01236261.).

Indexed as

AgedAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCandida glabrataCandidemiaEchinocandinsFemaleFluconazoleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFluconazoleliposomal amphotericin B

Identifiers

PMID26976872
PMCPMC4879398
OpenAlexW2405161870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.