Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26976713›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2016

The Periprocedural Management of Anticoagulation and Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors in Endoscopic Interventions.

Christian M Lange, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Wolfgang Miesbach, Stefan Zeuzem, Jörg Albert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Oral Anticoagulation.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  9. Desmopressin as a Treatment Attempt.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  10. No Benefit for Idarucizumab.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  11. Interventional Endoscopy--Opportunities and Limitations.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian M LangeGastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine 1, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Cardiology, Department of Medicine 3, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine 2, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main.
Stephan Fichtlscherer
Wolfgang Miesbach
Stefan Zeuzem
Jörg Albert
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, more than half a million persons, most of them elderly, are under long-term treatment with anticoagulants. The approval of new oral anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors, as well as new data on periprocedural bridging with heparins, have introduced marked complexity to the management of treatment with anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors for endoscopic interventions in visceral surgery.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed, as well as on the relevant guidelines.

resultsRobust data are available on the management of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and platelet aggregation inhibitors for endoscopic procedures; on the other hand, the data on the periprocedural management of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are still inadequate. Endoscopic procedures that carry a low risk of bleeding can be performed under treatment with anticoagulants or platelet aggregation inhibitors. Before any procedure with a high risk of bleeding (≥ 1.5%) oral anticoagulants of any type and P2Y12 inhibitors should generally be discontinued. Patients in whom VKA are temporarily discontinued for this reason need bridging treatment with heparin only if they are at high risk of thromboembolic events (≥ 10% per year). For patients who are anticoagulated with NOAC, timely discontinuation of the drug depending on renal function is of key importance, and bridging is usually unnecessary.

conclusionAdequate scientific evidence supports the current recommendations and treatment algorithms for the periprocedural management of oral anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors in endoscopic procedures. Larger-scale studies are still needed to provide a sound basis for the corresponding recommendations about NOAC.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleEndoscopyEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHemorrhageHumansPerioperative CarePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPractice Guidelines as TopicAnticoagulantsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26976713
PMCPMC4800158
OpenAlexW2418966740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.