ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2016
The Endoscopic Treatment of Iatrogenic Gastrointestinal Perforation.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of postoperative anastomotic fistula of the gastrointestinal tract: a case report.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- [Increasing infection parameters after initiation of nasal tube feeding].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
- [Endoscopic Treatments in Perforation or Fistula in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024Review
- Evaluation of ERCP-related perforation: a single-center retrospective study.Gastroenterology report · 2024Article
- Piriform Fossa Injury during Calibration Tube Insertion in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Retrospective analysis of different therapeutic approaches for retroperitoneal duodenal perforations.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Endoluminal vacuum closure of a duodenal perforation.Journal of surgical case reports · 2021Article
- Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Gastric Subepithelial Lesions Arising from the Muscularis Propria.Clinical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Endoscopic Management of Perforations in the Gastrointestinal Tract.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016Article
- Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy Was Omitted.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Article
- In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Article
- Interventional Endoscopy--Opportunities and Limitations.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Article
- Successful Endoscopic Management of Double Iatrogenic Perforations Induced by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Computed Tomography-Guided Colon Drainage.Case reports in gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIatrogenic gastrointestinal perforation is a life-threatening complication that arises very rarely in routine endoscopic procedures, with an incidence of 0.03-0.8%. It is more likely in highly complex and invasive therapeutic interventions. In certain situations, endoscopic closure of the perforation and treatment with antibiotics can obviate the need for emergency surgical repair.
methodsThis review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed and on a relevant position paper.
resultsExisting clinical studies of treatment for iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforation are mainly retrospective and uncontrolled. No randomized and controlled trials have been performed to date. If the perforation is discovered soon after it arises, endoscopic treatment can be considered. Gastrointestinal perforations that are less than 30 mm in size can be closed with a clip. In the esophagus, expanding metal stents can be used as well. Clip application is successful in 80-100% of cases of gastrointestinal perforation, and the perforation remains permanently closed in 60-100% of cases. Reports on the endoscopic treatment of esophageal perforation show mixed results, with closure rates of roughly 90% and clinical success rates of roughly 80%. If endoscopic treatment is not possible, timely laparoscopic or open surgical repair is needed.
conclusionThe endoscopic treatment of iatrogenic perforations is safe and reliable. Success depends on early detection, adequate endoscopic closure with properly mastered technique, and the early initiation of concomitant antibiotic treatment, which must be continued for a full course. Most patients who are treated in this way do not need emergency surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.