Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26976712›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2016

The Endoscopic Treatment of Iatrogenic Gastrointestinal Perforation.

Arthur Schmidt, Karl-Hermann Fuchs, Karel Caca, Armin Küllmer, Alexander Meining

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Endoscopic Treatments in Perforation or Fistula in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endoluminal vacuum closure of a duodenal perforation.Journal of surgical case reports · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy Was Omitted.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  12. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  13. Interventional Endoscopy--Opportunities and Limitations.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur SchmidtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery,, AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus Frankfurt am Main, Ulm University Hospital Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine I.
Karl-Hermann Fuchs
Karel Caca
Armin Küllmer
Alexander Meining
Klinikum Ludwigsburg · DEAgaplesion Markus Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIatrogenic gastrointestinal perforation is a life-threatening complication that arises very rarely in routine endoscopic procedures, with an incidence of 0.03-0.8%. It is more likely in highly complex and invasive therapeutic interventions. In certain situations, endoscopic closure of the perforation and treatment with antibiotics can obviate the need for emergency surgical repair.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed and on a relevant position paper.

resultsExisting clinical studies of treatment for iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforation are mainly retrospective and uncontrolled. No randomized and controlled trials have been performed to date. If the perforation is discovered soon after it arises, endoscopic treatment can be considered. Gastrointestinal perforations that are less than 30 mm in size can be closed with a clip. In the esophagus, expanding metal stents can be used as well. Clip application is successful in 80-100% of cases of gastrointestinal perforation, and the perforation remains permanently closed in 60-100% of cases. Reports on the endoscopic treatment of esophageal perforation show mixed results, with closure rates of roughly 90% and clinical success rates of roughly 80%. If endoscopic treatment is not possible, timely laparoscopic or open surgical repair is needed.

conclusionThe endoscopic treatment of iatrogenic perforations is safe and reliable. Success depends on early detection, adequate endoscopic closure with properly mastered technique, and the early initiation of concomitant antibiotic treatment, which must be continued for a full course. Most patients who are treated in this way do not need emergency surgery.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHumansIatrogenic DiseaseIntestinal PerforationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26976712
PMCPMC4800157
OpenAlexW2395046601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.