ArticleResuscitation2016
Themes and variations: An exploratory international investigation into resuscitation decision-making.
Article in Resuscitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Views and attitudes of healthcare professionals on do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation in low-and-lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic models for outcome prediction following in-hospital cardiac arrest using pre-arrest factors: a systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluation of adherence to national regulations for documentation of limitations of life-sustaining treatments after a limited intervention at a Swedish hospital.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- A content and quality analysis on open online platform videos on do not resuscitate (DNR).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Resuscitation discussion practices: a survey of European geriatricians.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2025Article
- Demographic influences on Lithuanian physicians' attitudes toward medical assistance in dying: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Observational
- Article
- The experiences of adult patients, families, and healthcare professionals of CPR decision-making conversations in the United Kingdom: A qualitative systematic review.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
- Factors influencing terminal cancer patients' autonomous DNR decision: a longitudinal statutory document and clinical database study.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses.BMC medical ethics · 2021Observational
- Do-(Not-)Mechanical-Circulatory-Support Orders: Should We Ask All Cardiac Surgery Patients for Informed Consent for Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Circulatory Support?Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Creating pre-conditions for change in clinical practice: the influence of interactions between multiple contexts and human agency.Journal of health organization and management · 2020Article
- Resuscitation discussions: learning from Covid-19.The clinical teacher · 2020Article
- Low Rates of Survival Seen in Orthopedic Patients Receiving In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Ethical challenges in resuscitation.Intensive care medicine · 2018Review
- Translating into Practice Cancer Patients' Views on Do-Not-Resuscitate Decision-Making.Cancers · 2016Article
- Moving from "Do Not Resuscitate" Orders to Standardized Resuscitation Plans and Shared-Decision Making in Hospital Inpatients.Gerontology & geriatric medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDo Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions are made in hospitals throughout the globe. International variation in clinicians' perception of DNACPR decision-making and implementation and the factors influencing such variation has not previously been explored.
methodsA questionnaire asking how DNACPR decisions are made, communicated and perceived in their country was composed: it consisted of seven closed-answer and four open-answer questions. It was distributed to 143 medical professionals with prior published material relating to DNACPR decisions. Under-represented geographical areas were identified and an additional 34 physicians were contacted through medical colleagues and students at the university hospital from which this study was based. The respondents had 4 weeks to answer the questionnaire.
results78 responses (44%) were received from 43 countries. All continents were represented. 88% of respondents reported a method for implementing DNACPR decisions, 90% of which discussed resuscitation wishes with the patient at least half of the time. 94% of respondents thought that national guidance for DNACPR order implementation should exist; 53% of countries surveyed reported existence of such guidance. Cultural attitudes towards death, medical education and culture, health economics and the societal role of family were commonly identified as factors influencing perception of DNACPR decisions.
conclusionsThe majority of countries surveyed make some form of DNACPR decision but differing cultures and economic status contribute towards a heterogeneity of approaches to resuscitation decision-making. Adequacy of relevant medical education and national policy are two areas that were regularly identified as impacting upon the processes of DNACPR decision-making and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.