Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26976672›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Assessment of red blood cell deformability in type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy by dual optical tweezers stretching technique.

Rupesh Agrawal, Thomas Smart, João Nobre-Cardoso, Christopher Richards, Rhythm Bhatnagar, Adnan Tufail, David Shima, Phil H Jones, Carlos Pavesio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. African walnut (Frontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Microfluidic-based systems for the management of diabetes.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rupesh AgrawalMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Thomas SmartDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, UK.
João Nobre-CardosoMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Christopher RichardsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, UK.
Rhythm BhatnagarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Adnan TufailMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
David ShimaInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Phil H JonesDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, UK.
Carlos PavesioMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
University College London · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A pilot cross sectional study was conducted to investigate the role of red blood cells (RBC) deformability in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) without and with diabetic retinopathy (DR) using a dual optical tweezers stretching technique. A dual optical tweezers was made by splitting and recombining a single Nd:YAG laser beam. RBCs were trapped directly (i.e., without microbead handles) in the dual optical tweezers where they were observed to adopt a "side-on" orientation. RBC initial and final lengths after stretching were measured by digital video microscopy, and a Deformability index (DI) calculated. Blood from 8 healthy controls, 5 T2DM and 7 DR patients with respective mean age of 52.4 yrs, 51.6 yrs and 52 yrs was analysed. Initial average length of RBCs for control group was 8.45 ± 0.25 μm, 8.68 ± 0.49 μm for DM RBCs and 8.82 ± 0.32 μm for DR RBCs (p < 0.001). The DI for control group was 0.0698 ± 0.0224, and that for DM RBCs was 0.0645 ± 0.03 and 0.0635 ± 0.028 (p < 0.001) for DR group. DI was inversely related to basal length of RBCs (p =  .02). DI of RBC from DM and DR patients was significantly lower in comparison with normal healthy controls. A dual optical tweezers method can hence be reliably used to assess RBC deformability.

Indexed as

Optical TweezersCell ShapeCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyErythrocyte DeformabilityErythrocytesFemaleHematologyHumansMaleMicroscopy, VideoMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26976672
PMCPMC4792142
OpenAlexW2416349245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.