Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26976605›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Re-evaluation of the roles of DROSHA, Export in 5, and DICER in microRNA biogenesis.

Young-Kook Kim, Boseon Kim, V Narry Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 287 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
287citing papers in PubMed
28.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

287 citing papers in PubMed, 429 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Association ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article

227 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Young-Kook KimCenter for RNA Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Korea; Department of Biochemistry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju 61469, Korea; Center for Creative Biomedical Scientists, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju 61469, Korea; narrykim@snu.ac.kr ykk@jnu.ac.kr.
Boseon KimCenter for RNA Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Korea; School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
V Narry KimCenter for RNA Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Korea; School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea narrykim@snu.ac.kr ykk@jnu.ac.kr.
Seoul National University · KRChonnam National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biogenesis of canonical microRNAs (miRNAs) involves multiple steps: nuclear processing of primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) by DROSHA, nuclear export of precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA) by Export in 5 (XPO5), and cytoplasmic processing of pre-miRNA by DICER. To gain a deeper understanding of the contribution of each of these maturation steps, we deleted DROSHA, XPO5, and DICER in the same human cell line, and analyzed their effects on miRNA biogenesis. Canonical miRNA production was completely abolished in DROSHA-deleted cells, whereas we detected a few DROSHA-independent miRNAs including three previously unidentified noncanonical miRNAs (miR-7706, miR-3615, and miR-1254). In contrast to DROSHA knockout, many canonical miRNAs were still detected without DICER albeit at markedly reduced levels. In the absence of DICER, pre-miRNAs are loaded directly onto AGO and trimmed at the 3' end, yielding miRNAs from the 5' strand (5p miRNAs). Interestingly, in XPO5 knockout cells, most miRNAs are affected only modestly, suggesting that XPO5 is necessary but not critical for miRNA maturation. Our study demonstrates an essential role of DROSHA and an important contribution of DICER in the canonical miRNA pathway, and reveals that the function of XPO5 can be complemented by alternative mechanisms. Thus, this study allows us to understand differential contributions of key biogenesis factors, and provides with valuable resources for miRNA research.

Indexed as

Base SequenceCell LineDEAD-box RNA HelicasesGene Expression RegulationGene Knockout TechniquesHumansKaryopherinsMicroRNAsMolecular Sequence DataRibonuclease IIIDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDICER1 protein, humanDROSHA protein, humanKaryopherinsMicroRNAsMIRN484 microRNA, humanRibonuclease IIIXPO5 protein, humanDICERDROSHAExportin 5knockoutmicroRNA

Identifiers

PMID26976605
PMCPMC4822641
OpenAlexW2299595562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.