ReviewCritical care (London, England)2016
Bedside myocardial perfusion assessment with contrast echocardiography.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04397640 (Study of Myocardial Microcirculatory Alterations in Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock Using Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of Myocardial Microcirculatory Alterations in Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock Using Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography (MCE)
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Microbubble Reduction to Facilitate IVUS Guidance During Endovascular Radiofrequency Wire Procedures.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Feasibility of myocardial perfusion assessment with contrast echocardiography: can it improve recognition of significant coronary artery disease in the ICU?Critical care (London, England) · 2019Observational
- Recent technological advancements in cardiac ultrasound imaging.Ultrasonics · 2018Review
- Pearls and pitfalls in comprehensive critical care echocardiography.Critical care (London, England) · 2017Review
- Cardiac imaging: working towards fully-automated machine analysis & interpretation.Expert review of medical devices · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency medicine 2016. Other selected articles can be found online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2016. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.