ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2016
Digoxin toxicity: Case for retiring its use in elderly patients?
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Assess Ritonavir-Digoxin Interactions and Recommendations for Co-Administration Regimens.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Article
- Article
- New uses for an old remedy: Digoxin as a potential treatment for steatohepatitis and other disorders.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- A case report on anesthetic challenges in the post-Covid complication of active mucormycosis: Patient preparedness for family physicians.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
- Digoxin Exhibits Neuroprotective Properties in a Rat Model of Dementia.Neurochemical research · 2022Article
- Drug Response Diversity: A Hidden Bacterium?Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Symptomatic digoxin toxicity in a patient on haemodialysis.BMJ case reports · 2020Article
- Digoxin in Atrial Fibrillation: An Old Topic Revisited.Current cardiology reviews · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26975913PMC4984589What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.